SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (12166)12/9/2009 12:03:32 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42652
 
Every law that's enforced strongly is in the end enforced by a death penalty.

That seems a pretty big stretch to me. Can you back that notion up?

The woman nagging her husband almost certainly does not anticipate the reaction of robbing the bank

Neither does anyone passing a law that requires a fine for inaction. Those passing the law reasonable anticipate that people will either take the action or pay the fine. Sure, there are always some nuts out there but you can't design laws around nuts.

Further, no one expects this law to be enforced strongly, I don't think. It just wouldn't be feasible to do so even if a few scofflaws were important enough to warrant the resources strong enforcement would take.



To: TimF who wrote (12166)12/9/2009 12:06:28 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Every law that's enforced strongly is in the end enforced by a death penalty.

Huh?

Also are you forgetting the "consent of the governed" thing?