Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (12187)	12/9/2009 2:33:51 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 42652

Liberal Lindsey Graham it ain't gonna happen. The sen. will not cut medicare

To: Road Walker who wrote (12187)	12/9/2009 4:42:58 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

I think it is VERY likely the congress will cut Medicare Advantage subsidies. Which does little, if anything, to help the overall situation. MA provides benefits that straight Medicare doesn't. You started off, months ago, claiming the problem is Medical costs too high as a percent of GDP. Now, you're effectively saying, "Well, that doesn't matter; what's important is that we shift the burden to private insurance companies and ultimately, to the beneficiary" -- who will have to just purchase coverage from private insurance companies to pick up the difference. In principal, I think it is fine to cut MA subsidies, with the understanding that you are also going to see benefit cuts which defeats the purpose of MA. So, these individuals are going back to straight medicare with a supplement. You haven't DONE anything. What CBO is doubting, and Elmendorf has specifically said so -- is that Congress can eliminate waste, fraud and abuse -- they haven't been able to do so yet, and that's why he questioned it. The MA part is simply a matter of making law but it doesn't do anything to solve the problem you articulated months ago.