Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (535724)	12/11/2009 10:29:45 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577116

"CJ, no one is denying the Tyndall effect." Then why is it a red herring? It is a known quantity. It can be measured and modeled. And it can be shown to have an effect in the quantities that are measured. Yet, somehow, it is a red herring. You never explain this. Nor any other GW denier. They just wave their hand and airily dismiss it without any explanation. That is, assuming, they even recognize it exists which is the usual case. "Like I said, Al Gore is tossing out a red herring." Labeling something doesn't make it true. You have to, you know, come up with plausible reasons why that might be the case. Hypothesizing reasons why it might be true is a start, but you have to provide at least as much support as what you are dismissing has. That you haven't done.