Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (535802)	12/11/2009 12:18:05 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577903

CJ, > Sure they are. They happened. Both were regional in scope. en.wikipedia.org > Since the discovery of the Little Ice Age, there have been doubts about whether it was a global phenomenon or a cold spell restricted to the Northern Hemisphere. In recent years, several scientific works have pointed out the existence of cold spells and climate changes in areas of the Southern Hemisphere, and their correlation to the Little Ice Age. Tenchusatsu

To: combjelly who wrote (535802)	12/11/2009 1:13:34 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577903

To deny it is ignoring all the evidence contrary, along with your made up charts and half-truths. You mean like the charts about the northern ice cap yet ignore the growth in the southern and that net world ice is constant or slightly up. This is like picking only one spot for land based temps and extrapolating to the planet. Or the one regarding the climate models that don't track or account for the past 12 years of cooling - only when they point up do you believe them. The fact co2 in air has been rising for the last 12 years, the models predict more warming, but it's just not there. It tends to cast doubt in thinking minds and that the forcing is far less than predicted by the models. No explanation of lagging co2 in ice cores, the middle warm period, the little ice age etc. They do have an agenda. Most of the scientists have some link to Big Oil and many of the rest are politically fueled. That's a lie - and you still ignore the ones that have no link. My only link is the gas I put in my car. Global Al repeats a lie a day and goes unchallenged, ignores one pole completely and thinks the planet core is millions of degrees in addition to all his other lies and misstatements.