To: Land Shark who wrote (26878 ) 12/13/2009 2:15:28 PM From: Maurice Winn 1 Recommendation Respond to of 36917 Cant, the Global Warm-mongers have cobbled together a theory. They have made computer models which they claim represent their theories well enough to change the world's economic system in very dramatic and expensive ways. <You're the religious one with your "faith" that there's no problem... > They are the ones who have faith that their theories and computer models are correct. It's faith because the data disagrees with their theories. They predicted heating over the last dozen years. We got cooling. When reality doesn't match the theory, it isn't reality which is wrong. There is no evidence of Global Warming due to CO2 emissions by people. Neither is there good cause to think there would be. While parts of the theory are true, such as CO2 absorbs certain wavelengths of light, and it's also true that people have increased the CO2 concentrations from about 300 parts per million to nearly 400 parts per million, that does NOT mean that the rest of the faith-based initiative is correct. When the calls are to have faith while the data is diddled, the lies are denied, the graphs are bent, the deniers are denied, slurs are used as argument instead of data and reason, we can reasonably conclude that there's nobody home in the climate research cash flow cartel. There does not appear to be a problem. On the contrary, CO2 emission is a good thing. When CO2 is called a pollutant, that's another lie and misuse of a word leading to the conclusion that dishonesty is the primary characteristic of the climate priest hood and cash flow and power are the aims. Too much water can lead to flooding and drowning. That doesn't mean water is a pollutant. Food isn't a pollutant, but too much of that is fatal with millions killed by putting too much of it in their mouths. CO2 is not a pollutant. Mqurice