Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Garden Rose who wrote (271995)	12/15/2009 11:26:26 AM
From: Hawkmoon	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

I could care less about China or anyone else. I just believe that the US should not be an interventionist country. So we should never intervene? Not in Darfur.. Not in Rwanda? Just let other countries/entities conquer and oppress millions, if not billions of people? Do nothing to stop radical and fanatical governments with global ambitions of conquest from obtaining WMDs. We shouldn't prevent them from strapping biological or chemical agents to the chests of their martyrs, whom they send around the world to terrorize and kill innocent people? We shouldn't intervene to stop wholesale slaughter and starvation? We shouldn't intervene to stop pirates from seizing our ships and holding the crew hostage? Just sit on our @sses and take what the world deals out to us, right? Turn the other cheek and be meek?? So tell us GR.. Exactly WHEN do you think we should intervene? Do you have a threshold on intervention? Hawk