Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (81983)	12/14/2009 2:43:32 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"I didn't imply or claim to have a nonsytematic system but what I do post is exempt from the problems associated with the major categorical systems because the attributions of corruption don't/can't apply (see referent post)." No one can tell because you refuse to be forthright about the basis for your positions, rendering them closed to examination. and untestable. You are beyond corruption. Must be nice. "I didn't claim any worldviews to be false, I did claim the applications of the systems are corrupt, I provided a justification for that claim,..." Here's what you said: "...all are belief systems bound to venture into corrupt waters of perverted doctrine, coercive control, and manipulation by self serving elite authorities, infecting devotes with dogmatic attitudes, who then attack and ridicule any who would raise uncomfortable questions." You made an accusation that you backed up with assertions nothing more. You seem to think that you are exempt from any corruption by refusing to answer honest questions about your own views. In fact you imply that having any worldview at all inevitably leads to the corruption that you find so distasteful. Of course you must first KNOW what is pure before you can identify the CORRUPT. You claim to SEE this and yet you claim to have no EYES (no worldview). "Your insistance that my perspectives must fit neatly into one or the other of your classifications is unfounded." Your obsession with hiding behind the clouds of smoke that you produce by rubbing words together is rather humorous. <<In fact those who think they have no preconceptions and dogmas are in my experience the most blindly intolerant, tolerant people one could ever hope to meet>> "Yet another baseless allogation. One ironically based on your preconceptions and dogmatic adherence." Whatever an allogation is I'm not sure, but it was a simple observation. Do you have any preconceptions or dogmas? "You know nothing of me, my life, or my circumstance. Yet you judge me." Yet another thing that you apply to me but that does not seem to apply to you. Too funny! <<As it is, you are just blowing smoke...>> "What smoke?" You can't or won't see it, because your eyes are closed so you won't get smoke in your eyes. "what I do post is exempt from the problems associated with the major categorical systems because the attributions of corruption don't/can't apply" YA, RIGHT! No position eliminates even the possibility of corruption. Is THAT your position?