SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/15/2009 3:07:16 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362478
 
Sea Otter: I've used everything from the old Motorola flip phones to the crackberrys...Most of my relatives on the west coast have all switched to the iPhone - and most love it...my mother is using the iPhone up in Michigan and when traveling but the AT&T network has provided her with some spotty service (and some frustration)....and IMO, Apple's exclusive deal with AT&T has prevented millions of potential enterprise customers from switching to the iPhone...It's quite clear that Verizon has the best national cell phone network -- by a long shot...as soon as Apple opens up their iPhone to Verizon and others they will expand their market dramatically (and I would consider a new iPhone form factor that actually has a blackberry like keyboard as well)...fyi...

Analyst: Verizon is the iPhone's next big feature

news.cnet.com

Is iPhone Design To Blame For AT&T Subscriber Woes?

crn.com

Google Phone Ups the Ante

ctoedge.com



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/15/2009 4:57:32 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
For 2010, IDC Predicts an Apple iPad and Battles in the Cloud

bit.ly



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/15/2009 11:26:35 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362478
 
Cloud storage predictions for 2010

ow.ly



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/16/2009 3:23:46 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
“We can't think narrowly. We have to think in the biggest possible way.”

~Alice Waters (1944 – ) American chef and writer



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/18/2009 4:21:44 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
Oracle Rises After Company Beats Estimates, Cites U.S.

By Rochelle Garner and Connie Guglielmo

Dec. 18 (Bloomberg) -- Oracle Corp., the world’s second- largest software maker, rose 5.1 percent in late trading yesterday after topping profit estimates and saying that U.S. customers are once again spending on technology.

“We are definitely seeing customers back buying,” Oracle President Safra Catz said on a conference call. “No giant deals of any sort, but lots of very nice-size transactions for every size of company. We are really seeing a recovery.”

Second-quarter net income rose 13 percent to $1.46 billion, or 29 cents a share, from $1.3 billion, or 25 cents, a year earlier, Oracle said. Excluding some costs, profit was 39 cents in the period, which ended Nov. 30. Analysts in a Bloomberg survey estimated 36 cents on average.

Companies across industries, including financial services, communications and retail, have resumed spending -- a trend that is continuing this quarter, Oracle said. The company is also benefitting from a five-year, $42 billion acquisition spree, which boosted demand for Oracle’s software-support contracts.

“Oracle clearly saw a return to a better spending environment,” said Sarah Friar, an analyst with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in San Francisco. She recommends buying the shares, which she doesn’t own. “We’re definitely seeing an enterprise tech spending rebound in the U.S.”

Shares Advance

Oracle, based in Redwood City, California, rose as much as $1.16 to $24.04 in extended trading. The shares have climbed 29 percent this year on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Excluding some costs, profit will be 36 cents to 38 cents a share this quarter, Oracle said. That compares with a 36-cent average estimate among analysts. Sales will grow 3 percent to 6 percent in the period, indicating revenue of as much as $5.8 billion. Analysts had projected $5.71 billion.

Including revenue from acquired companies, sales rose 3.3 percent to $5.87 billion last quarter, topping the estimate of $5.7 billion.

Oracle said some of that gain came at the expense of SAP AG, its larger rival in the market for business-management software.

“We grew faster than SAP in every region around the world, clearly taking market share, as they have essentially come apart at the seams,” Catz said on the call.

Lindsey Held, a spokeswoman for Walldorf, Germany-based SAP, didn’t immediately return an after-hours phone call seeking comment.

Sun Strategy

Oracle also discussed its proposed $7.4 billion acquisition of Sun Microsystems Inc., the fourth-largest maker of server computers. That deal, announced in April, has been delayed by a European antitrust review. The company expects a “full and unconditional clearance” from the European Commission in January, Catz said.

Chief Executive Officer Larry Ellison said Oracle won’t pursue Sun’s low-margin, high-volume server business. The company will cede that market to the current leaders, International Business Machines Corp., Hewlett-Packard Co. and Dell Inc., he said. Instead, Oracle plans to push sales of more profitable, high-performance servers, said Ellison, 65.

Oracle’s decision to focus on servers that yield higher profits “makes me feel better about the margins they can get out of the deal,” said Goldman Sachs’s Friar.

The company reiterated a forecast that Sun will contribute $1.5 billion in profit the first fiscal year after the transaction is complete.

To maintain growth, Oracle has acquired 54 companies in the past five years, including the $10.3 billion takeover of PeopleSoft Inc. The spree helped Oracle more than double sales and expand beyond its dominant database software. The acquisitions also turned Oracle into a one-stop software shop for business customers.

Oracle has added programs that run a range of tasks, from human-resources management to analyzing internal operations. The programs also target specific industries, such as utilities, retail and manufacturing. Only Microsoft Corp., the largest software maker, offers as many categories of programs as Oracle.

To contact the reporters on this story: Rochelle Garner in San Francisco at rgarner4@bloomberg.net; Connie Guglielmo in San Francisco at cguglielmo1@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: December 18, 2009 00:01 EST



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/18/2009 6:01:29 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
The Top 10 Trends for 2010 in Analytics, Business Intelligence, and Performance Management

bit.ly



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/19/2009 12:45:08 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
Google In Talks to Buy Yelp

______________________________________________________________

December 18, 2009 -- SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -- Google Inc is in talks to buy Yelp Inc, the popular website for reviews of local businesses, in a deal that could help the Internet search leader tap a lucrative local ads market, media reports say.

Google may pay more than $500 million (308 million pound) for Yelp, according to reports confirmed to Reuters by a person familiar with the situation. It came as the Web giant embarked on an acquisition spree that has netted at least five companies since August.

By swallowing privately held Yelp, Google would own one of the Web's most popular repositories of local restaurant and small-business information, including more than 8 million reviews penned by Yelp's users.

That trove of content and a heavy focus on local businesses could provide a valuable foothold for Google as it seeks to convince local merchants to shift their advertising spending to the Internet.

"The local advertising market is a multibillion dollar market that for all intents and purposes is still untapped on the Web," said Needham & Co analyst Mark May.

In July, Internet portal Yahoo Inc teamed up with AT&T Corp in a partnership that involved the phone company's 5,000 sales people selling Yahoo advertising inventory to local businesses.

News of the recent talks between Google and Yelp -- backed by Benchmark Capital and other venture capital firms -- and the $500 million price tag were first reported by the blog TechCrunch.

The source familiar with the situation said talks were currently bogged down by concerns among some Yelp investors that the company could be selling itself prematurely, and that it could be worth far more than $500 million if it had a chance to develop its business.

The source added that Friday's news stories may have been floated to put pressure on for the deal to be consummated at a price that was too low.

SECOND-TIME SUITOR

Yelp said in an emailed statement that it is frequently approached to discuss "partnerships, investments and more, and the company does not comment on private discussions that may occur."

A Google spokeswoman said the company does not comment on rumours or speculation.

Google has had its eye on Yelp for some time. According to one former Google executive, the Internet company had had "early discussions" with Yelp about an acquisition several years ago, but ultimately passed on the deal.

"Yelp doesn't monetize very well, so it's always a bit hard to justify an acquisition," the person said.

The local businesses that Yelp sells online advertising to are more interested in promoting their businesses through coupons than online ads, he added, noting he believed Yelp was still an unprofitable business.

Yelp was founded in 2004 and has received $30 million in funding from Benchmark Capital, DAG Ventures and Bessemer Venture Partners.

The acquisition talks are the latest in a string of recent deals by Google, including the $750 million acquisition of mobile ad firm AdMob announced in November, that are designed to extend Google's reach into new advertising markets.

The world's No. 1 Internet search engine generated roughly $22 billion in revenues last year, but has seen its top line growth slow from the 40 percent-plus clip it was managing as recently as early 2008.

Google has stepped up efforts to court local merchants recently, encouraging businesses to register their information on its small-business online directory.

But some analysts say Google will have its work cut out trying to sell online ads to local merchants more comfortable with traditional channels like local television, newspapers and the Yellow Pages.

Needham's May estimated that Yelp, which had 8.9 million unique visitors to its site in November according to comScore, is generating revenue at an annual rate of $15 million to $20 million.

"That's a pretty tough nut to crack," May said about selling online ads to local merchants. "Whether Google can crack the code on it, is still to be seen."

(Additional reporting by David Lawsky; Editing by Edwin Chan and Richard Chang)



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/19/2009 6:37:15 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
Go beyond the stock price. YCharts provides individual investors with unique, innovative online tools that empower them to invest and trade stocks like professional money managers.

YCharts was founded out of frustration with current investor research options that focus on snapshot data, real-time prices, technical analysis and ignore the long-term core business trends. YCharts eliminates the manual process of analyzing company/market trends and makes them visual, interactive and social. YCharts is your fundamental company research engine.

Our team is based in Chicago and New York with experience at Google, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Tribune and WallStreetView.

We’re building a powerful market research tool that combines advanced data analysis, visualizations and proprietary algorithms to help investors analyze companies and ultimately make better investment decisions.”...

ycharts.com

ycharts.com



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/21/2009 5:14:32 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
The 2010 Tech IPO Boom

seekingalpha.com



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/21/2009 9:48:02 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
Twitter Is Said to Be Profitable After Making Search Agreements

By Spencer E. Ante

Dec. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Twitter Inc. will make about $25 million from Internet-search deals with Google Inc. and Microsoft Corp. announced in October, enough to push the site into profitability, people familiar with the matter said.

An agreement that made Twitter’s messages searchable on Google’s site will generate about $15 million, said the people, who asked to remain anonymous because the terms aren’t public. A similar deal with Microsoft’s Bing search engine will earn Twitter about $10 million.

The multiyear agreements will allow Twitter to make a small profit in 2009, said the people, who estimate that its operating costs are about $20 million to $25 million a year. The San Francisco-based company, which started in 2006, has about 105 employees, according to its Web site.

Until earlier this year, Twitter wasn’t even focused on revenue -- let alone profit. The company attracted millions of users with a free service that posts 140-character messages, known as tweets. Chief Executive Officer Evan Williams said two months ago that the company was spending almost all its time improving the product, rather than seeking ways to make money.

That left many analysts and investors wondering how Twitter would convert its popularity into earnings. Twitter has more than 58 million global monthly users, according to ComScore Inc., a research firm in Reston, Virginia. The service is the third most popular social-networking site in the U.S., after Facebook Inc. and News Corp.’s MySpace.

No Comment

The company’s co-founder, Biz Stone, declined to comment on its finances, saying only that Twitter is proud of the work it accomplished in 2009.

“We’re thrilled about the partnerships we’ve formed this year and we’re looking forward to opening Twitter even more in the future,” Stone said in an e-mail.

Jane Penner, a spokeswoman for Mountain View, California- based Google, declined to comment, as did Pete Wootton, a spokesman for Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft. When the agreements were announced in October, none of the companies involved disclosed their value.

Twitter got help achieving profitability by reducing expenses, the people familiar with the situation said. The company used to pay more money to telecommunications companies for distributing its billions of tweets over wireless networks. Twitter’s popularity has given it bargaining power with phone companies, helping it renegotiate deals to bring down costs.

Workforce Costs

While telecommunication fees used to be the company’s single largest expense, employees are now the biggest line item, said one of the people. That means maintaining profitability will depend on whether Twitter keeps a lid on the size of its workforce.

The payments from Google and Microsoft underscore the growing value of the data coursing through Twitter’s network. Executives of both companies have said their search sites would be considered incomplete if they didn’t include the millions of messages that get posted on Twitter every minute.

“We believe that our search results and user experience will greatly benefit from the inclusion of this up-to-the-minute data,” Marissa Mayer, Google’s vice president in charge of search products, said in a blog posting after the deals with Twitter were announced. “The next time you search for something that can be aided by a real-time observation, say, snow conditions at your favorite ski resort, you’ll find tweets from other users who are there.”

Consumer Tweets

Tweets also are a source of product information, with shoppers using Twitter to share views on their purchases. Making that kind of information available on Google and Bing may help them sell more advertising, and provide more relevant search results to shoppers.

Twitter, which started in 2006, has raised about $155 million in venture capital. A round in September for $100 million valued the company at $1 billion, according to a person familiar with the deal. The size of the valuation, along with Twitter’s lack of a revenue plan, was reminiscent of the dot-com era, David Garrity, principal at GVA Research LLC in New York, said at the time.

Since then, Twitter has given more details about how it plans to make money. In addition to the search deals, it’s planning an advertising program for early next year. The company also will charge for commercial Twitter accounts, which would let businesses analyze tweet traffic.

Chief Operating Officer Dick Costolo, who joined Twitter in September, was key to getting the search-engine deals done, one person familiar with the matter said. Costolo helped found FeedBurner and worked at Google as an ad product manager after his company was acquired.

At FeedBurner, Costolo worked on selling ads on Web news feeds. The goal at Twitter now is to add advertising without disrupting the way Twitter works, Costolo said last month at a conference.

“We want to do something that’s organic and in the flow of the way people already use Twitter -- and not, ‘Here’s the tweets and here are the ads,’” he said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Spencer E. Ante in New York at sante1@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: December 21, 2009 00:01 EST



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/23/2009 2:00:20 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
Very interesting predictions for the cleantech sector in 2010, from Bilal Zuberi at General Catalyst:

bit.ly



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)12/24/2009 1:17:07 AM
From: stockman_scott1 Recommendation  Respond to of 362478
 
Sapolsky's outstanding Stanford lecture on "The Uniqueness of Humans"

boingboing.net



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)1/5/2010 2:35:29 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
Following Venture Capital for Signs of Tech to Come
______________________________________________________________

By CLAIRE CAIN MILLER
The New York Times
January 4, 2010

After hibernating for the last year, Silicon Valley’s venture capitalists are beginning to stir.

Technology financiers raised about $14 billion to finance new companies in 2009, a sharp drop from $36 billion in 2007. But as the economic freeze begins to thaw, investors are once again writing checks to entrepreneurs.

Some of the ideas will become the big public companies of the future, following in the footsteps of one-time start-ups like Google, Cisco Systems and Amazon.com. Many more will fail because they are too early, late or unoriginal.

Yet whether individual companies make it or not, the new ideas that are intriguing top venture capitalists offer an early look at which technologies may transform the way we live in coming years.

COMPUTERS IN OUR POCKETS -- Tech pundits have long predicted that one day we would carry tiny computers in our pockets, and last year that began to happen with application phones like the iPhone.

Computing will become even more mobile this year, especially if Apple releases a rumored tablet computer, said Todd Chaffee, a general partner at Institutional Venture Partners in Mill Valley, Calif.

As the line between our phones and computers blurs, the way we use them will change. In 20 years, a keyboard and mouse will be archaic, like punch cards are today, said Brad Feld, a managing director of the Foundry Group in Boulder, Colo.

“With gesture-based, multitouch, spatially controlled, voice-activated and wearable computing, there is an unbelievable amount of innovation going on here,” he said.

For all the interest in mobile, venture investors are losing interest in start-ups that build iPhone applications. “That was a very exciting place to look at; the growth numbers were off the charts, but I think we all understand now that it’s very hard to build big businesses here,” said David Pakman, a partner at Venrock in New York.

This year, investors are most excited about Android, Google’s mobile operating system. In 2010, people are expected to buy two to three times as many Android-based phones as iPhones, “ripping apart the hegemony of the Apple ecosystem,” said Peter Fenton, a general partner at Benchmark Capital in Menlo Park, Calif.

GREEN TECH FIZZLES -- After years of breathless excitement about green technology, many venture capitalists have grown skeptical. “That one has been overhyped,” Mr. Chaffee said.

Venture capitalists invested just $1.6 billion in clean tech companies in the first nine months of 2009, compared with $3.1 billion in the same period in 2008, according to the National Venture Capital Association.

Many still think that saving the earth could be profitable, but on a smaller scale. Foundation Capital is interested in applications that use the smart electric grid to monitor, distribute and conserve energy. Battery Ventures is looking at companies that make devices like computers more energy efficient.

DATA OVERLOAD -- Among Tweets, Foursquare check-ins and text messages, we are all producing a lot more data than we were a year ago. However, “the way we’ve built Web sites for the last 15 years hasn’t really been designed to deal with the amount of data we’re now seeing because of the real-time Web,” Mr. Pakman said.

New technology companies will figure out how to tweak the architecture of the Web to accommodate the data deluge, he said.

Start-ups will figure out how to restore the balance between how much information we receive and our ability to process it, Mr. Feld said. For example, Foundry is investing in companies that manage and extract data from e-mail inboxes, as well as start-ups that give people access to personal data, like music and photos, from any computer, at any time.

A MORE EFFICIENT OFFICE -- Start-ups that make software and hardware for businesses will take a cue from consumer devices like the iPod and build products that are simpler to use, said Sunil Dhaliwal, a general partner at Battery Ventures in Boston.

“The guy buying software and hardware for your average company probably looks a whole lot more like a guy raised on an iPod and an iPhone than a guy in his 60s raised on Unix terminals and big old I.B.M. mainframes,” he said. “That’s going to ripple through technology sold to companies in a really dramatic way.”

Paul G. Koontz, a general partner at Foundation Capital in Menlo Park, said entrepreneurs were coming up with promising ideas for virtualization software and Web-based cloud computing, both of which give companies lower-cost options for maintaining their technologies.

“There’s no doubt in my mind that 10 years from now, our notion of the corporate data center is going to be gone, and the way that large companies use technology like software is going to be completely redefined,” he said.

Security companies that help Web sites and computer owners protect themselves are ripe for investment as well, said Ray Rothrock, a partner at Venrock in Palo Alto. Today, 80 percent to 97 percent of business e-mail messages are spam, he said, and malware, software that infects computers, has grown exponentially.

RETURN OF THE I.P.O.? -- Venture capitalists make most of their money on initial public offerings of the tech companies they invested in. But in each of the last two years, fewer than 10 companies have gone public, compared with 86 in 2007.

The new year could finally break the logjam, bringing more than 50 tech offerings, investment bankers say. That could include prominent companies like Facebook.

“There’s a big backup and there’s a lot of companies that have $100 million or more in revenue and are profitable or will be profitable next year, and there will be some huge I.P.O.’s,” said Mike Kwatinetz, a general partner at Azure Capital Partners in San Francisco. “What that will also do is heat up the M&A market.”

That is welcome news after a dark year, Mr. Dhaliwal said. “The mood is pretty optimistic, in that way that if you’re nearly killed in a car accident you’ve got a renewed positive outlook on life.”

Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)1/5/2010 3:01:24 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
VCs are being pushed to later stage investing

readwriteweb.com



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)1/5/2010 6:47:58 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362478
 
Fortune 500 companies using social media to reach customers
_______________________________________________________________

By Monica Ginsburg
Crain's Chicago Business
January 04, 2010

Last year, United Airlines found a new way to use Twitter to reward customers and fill empty seats. In May, the Chicago-based airline began offering a limited number of Twitter-exclusive fare deals, or "twares," to domestic and international destinations. The last-minute specials are sent out once or twice a week and typically expire within one or two hours. Most sell out in seconds, a United spokeswoman says.

"We want to give our followers something special that no one else can get," she says, while allowing the airline to fill seats that might otherwise go unoccupied.

Harnessing social media tools to boost sales, connect with customers and increase brand recognition has become standard operating procedure in Corporate America. More than 60% of Fortune 1,000 companies with a Web site will connect to or host some form of online community to build customer relationships, according to Gartner Inc., a Connecticut-based information technology research company. The flip side is that more than 50% will fail, Gartner says, ultimately eroding customer and company values.

The numbers among small businesses are more dire. A recent survey conducted by New York-based GfK Roper Consulting Group found that 76% of small-business owners say social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn are not helpful in generating business leads or expanding their operations. Eighty-six percent say they have not used social networking sites to get business advice or information.

That, experts say, is a mistake, because even for those consumer-oriented businesses well-versed in social media, the effort can be surprisingly effective, bringing in unexpected demographics and customer loyalty.

Northfield-based Kraft Foods Inc. launched its iFood Assistant application for iPhone and iPod touch users in November 2008 to help consumers locate Kraft products and prepare meals using them. One year later, the company reports that 22% of iFood Assistant users are men, higher than its traditionally female-heavy demographic, and 99% are first-time users of a Kraft Web site or Web-based tool.

In addition, six months after their initial download, more than 60% of users are still engaged with the application, according to the company. In comparison, some industry experts say that typically less than 5% of users are still involved with a downloadable app after two months. And while they won't release the number of iFood Assistant users, Ed Kaczmarek, Kraft's director of innovation and consumer experiences, says the company hit its three-year projection within the first month of introduction.

"We hit the sweet spot of finding what utility you can provide your consumers and what they consider to be of high value," Mr. Kaczmarek says.

To be sure, legal, privacy and other constraints mean some business segments — financial services and health care among them — may not readily lend themselves to the practice. But even there, social media tools can play a key role in building customer relationships, says Elizabeth Neumaier, creative director at White Gazelle, a Chicago marketing and advertising consultancy.

"Companies can use online tools to create feedback loops and get ideas to improve products or services from customers who are using your brand," she says.

Business owner Jim Schreiber is among those not impressed. He started Shui Tea Co. in September to import and sell 18 types of blended, loose-leaf and pressed tea online. He's been promoting the Lisle-based company on Twitter and Facebook since its launch, with little success. Using Google Analytics to monitor traffic, he found that people coming to his Web site from Twitter and Facebook spent on average only eight seconds on the site. "That's useless to me," Mr. Schreiber, 24, says.

While he's not closing his Twitter account, "I know personal interaction works," he says, so "why not spend my time on that?"

Online marketers say that businesses that haven't hit social media pay dirt may have jumped in without a clear idea of what they're trying to achieve. Others may not give their campaigns enough time to catch on with customers, partners or prospects. That's a mistake: Unless you're a household brand, they say, developing relationships, especially online, takes time.

"You need at least six to 12 months to get people following and participating in a dialogue about your company or your products or services," says Joel Warady, principal of Joel Warady Group, an Evanston marketing consulting firm. "But once they do, they will tell you everything," he says.

Here are some other ways to connect:

Start with a plan. Determine your goals and objectives and what role social media will play in an overall marketing campaign. Then find ways to share content and bring communities together. Market and promote your company's blog, Twitter contacts, fan pages, YouTube channels and any other media to targeted prospects and clients. "It should be strategic vs. ad-hoc," says Ross Kimbarovsky, co-founder of crowdSpring LLC, a Chicago-based online marketplace for creative services, and a social media blogger.

Identify which social media sites your customers are using. Search for your brand name, your competitors' names, key words or industry. On Twitter, tools such as Advanced Search, Twitter Grader and Twellow can help you find people who may be interested in what you have to say. Join Facebook, Flickr or LinkedIn groups relevant to your business and become part of the conversation.

Register your brand name on as many social media sites as possible, whether or not you plan to use them, and use the same name on each. Web sites such as KnowEm.com and UsernameCheck.com will check availability on a large listing of social media sites at no charge.

Don't chase technology. Social media changes rapidly and it's hard to keep up. Don't worry, says Andy Sernovitz, CEO of Chicago-based marketing consultancy GasPedal LLC. "If your customers aren't already there, there's no reason for you to be there," he says.

Instead, commit to one or two social-media sites and work on creating regular content. Readers, viewers and search engines will better recognize your expertise if you're consistent. And you can very quickly overextend your capacity by being in too many places and not doing it effectively. "The goal is not to be a technology innovator," says Mr. Sernovitz, author of "Word of Mouth Marketing: How Smart Companies Get People Talking." "It's good old-fashioned target marketing. Find your customers and jump in with them."

Determine what you'll say and who will be in charge of saying it, including responding to positive and negative comments. Guidelines should spell out what kind of information employees can and can't share. Make sure you are in compliance with Federal Trade Commission rules that went into effect Dec. 1 and cover testimonials, bloggers and endorsements. (Go to ftc.gov/opa/2009 for more information.)

Generate compelling content. Based on user feedback, the Art Institute of Chicago found its social media followers enjoyed watching behind-the-scenes videos of the new Modern Wing as it was built and of recent exhibitions as they were installed. In November, the museum announced that it was posting its last podcast to shift its focus to video. "Our sense was that the long-lead format of the podcast was not taking advantage of the technology that's out there," says Erin Hogan, the museum's director of public affairs and communications. "We want to focus on shorter pieces and post more of them to places such as ArtBabble, YouTube and Facebook," she says. "People really want that insider's view."

Post regularly and frequently, says Laura Watkins, marketing and communications coordinator for Chicago's Green City Market, a non-profit supporting and promoting local, sustainable agricultural practices. But avoid empty automated tweets or computer-generated messages, even if they seem more efficient. Ms. Watkins says she posts on social media sites including Facebook up to five times a week and often sends Twitter posts five times a day, focusing on topics that appeal to her followers such as trends in sustainable farming or preparing holiday meals with locally grown food. As a result, 15% of visits to the market's Web page come directly from social media outreach. "You're not creating a conversation if you're staying silent," she says.

Hold the sales pitch. The goal is to foster conversation, not push products. "It's not that people don't want to buy; people don't want to be sold," says Kevin Masi, principal at Torque Ltd., a marketing, design and advertising agency in Chicago.

Recognize that social media has changed the nature of customer communication. "The dialogue sometimes is critical and you have to be prepared for that," says Jim Andrews, senior vice-president and editorial director at IEG LLC, a corporate sponsorship and consulting firm based in Chicago. "But if you're going to play this game, that's part of it."

______________________________________________________________

Foursquare could be Next Big Thing among social media tools
By Monica Ginsburg
Crain's Chicago Business
January 04, 2010

Searching for the next big thing in social marketing? Meet Foursquare, a free service that mashes up social networks, maps and other features, then combines them with a rewards program for "checking in" at various locations and businesses, such as bars, restaurants and retailers.

Billed as the next Twitter, Foursquare has been increasing its user numbers by 45% to 50% each month, says the New York-based company, which boasts 150,000 users internationally, including 6,000 in Chicago, where it has been operating since March.

"Foursquare takes all that's hot on social media now — location-based advertising, contests, friends. It has the potential to be massive," says Daniel Prager, a social media consultant at Ocean Agency, a marketing firm in Chicago.

Foursquare, which posted no revenue in 2009, does not charge businesses to list their discounts and promotions, but that's likely to change as it looks for ways to turn a profit, according to Tristan Walker, who is in charge of business development.

Here's a look at what may become the next Foursquare:

ShopSavvy, from Dallas-based Big In Japan Inc., allows users to scan product bar codes with their mobile phones' camera. Using that information, ShopSavvy searches the Web for the lowest prices available online and at nearby brick-and-mortar retailers, then displays prices along with product reviews and paid advertisements. According to the company, 612,488 ShopSavvy application users scanned at least one item on the day after Thanksgiving, a sevenfold increase over the 86,000 average for a Friday. Total scans for the Thanksgiving weekend topped 18 million.

New York-based GoMobo, which launched in 2005, makes ordering fast food faster. Enter a street address to find nearby restaurants signed up with the service, then order and pay using a mobile Web, by text message or with a basic iPhone application. GoMobo is available in 20 cities and 500 locations nationwide, including some Burger King, Subway and Pizza Hut outlets. The service, which charges independent restaurants a 10% fee per transaction and large chains a $2-a-day fee per location, launched locally in 2007 with limited restaurant participation.

Chicago-based Groupon offers daily deals at restaurants, salons and other local businesses through the power of group buying. Its 1.7 million subscribers nationwide are alerted to new offers, and a pre-set minimum must agree to buy for the offers to be valid, otherwise the purchase price is refunded. The year-old service is available in 28 cities but should expand to 80 by yearend, CEO Andrew Mason says.

Businesses are featured on the site for free and are charged an average of 50% of the cost of each unit sold. Mr. Mason says he expects revenue to hit $100 million this year.

According to the company, 1 million Groupon specials have been sold to date, and the average Groupon restaurant customer spends 60% more than the value of the offer.



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)1/6/2010 12:15:53 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
NEA Closes Fund XIII with Nearly $2.5 Billion
_______________________________________________________________

New Enterprise Associates today announced that it has closed its thirteenth fund with nearly $2.5 billion in capital commitments. A regulatory filing from late last year had shown that the firm had $2.45 billion committed from 189 accredited investors, including around a 1% commitment from the general partner. NEA closed its previous fund with just over $2.5 billion in 2006.

PRESS RELEASE

January 6th, 2010 -- New Enterprise Associates, Inc. (NEA), a leading global venture capital firm, today announced the official close of its thirteenth fund, which it began investing in May of this year. At nearly $2.5 billion, it is comparable in size to NEA’s prior fund. This new fund represents an estimated 17 percent of all U.S. venture capital funds raised in 2009 and is the largest single fund raised since 2007. This fund brings NEA’s total committed capital to more than $11 billion across all of its funds.

“NEA is thrilled with the tremendous support shown by our limited partners during an incredibly challenging time for the venture capital industry,” said Peter J. Barris, Managing General Partner of NEA. “This is a resounding vote of confidence for NEA as we continue to execute on our global investing strategy, as well as a strong signal of the continued vitality of the venture industry.”

Consistent with the strategy employed for the firm’s fund raised in 2006, core investment areas for the new fund will be information technology, energy technology and healthcare. The fund will leverage the firm’s one-fund approach to venture capital and venture growth equity investing across the globe, with offices on both U.S. coasts and in China and India.

“Drawing on its deep domain expertise and extensive global network, NEA’s strategy focuses on finding the best opportunities to invest in transformational businesses,” said Mr. Barris. “Whether seed-stage or late-stage, domestic or global, we invest in companies where there is a tremendous growth opportunity for truly innovative businesses to establish industry leadership.”

In recent funds, NEA’s information technology and healthcare focus has expanded to include energy technology and the firm is among the most active investors in the sector. NEA has also expanded its global operations with affiliate offices in Beijing and Shanghai, China and Mumbai and Bangalore, India.

“NEA’s fundraising success demonstrates an ongoing recognition by the investment community of the direct role venture capital plays in fostering innovation, bringing new technologies to market and keeping the U.S. on the cutting edge of technology,” said Mark Heesen, President, National Venture Capital Association (NVCA). “Venture capital drives growth that can fuel the development of entire new industries, stimulate the economy and improve the quality of life here in the U.S. and around the world. NEA has been a leader in identifying breakthrough businesses and nurturing innovative companies. This most recent close further demonstrates the firm’s commitment to the American entrepreneurial engine.”

About NEA
New Enterprise Associates, Inc. (NEA) is a leading venture capital and growth equity firm focused on helping entrepreneurs build transformational businesses across multiple stages, sectors and geographies. With approximately $11 billion in committed capital, NEA invests in information technology, healthcare and energy technology companies at all stages in a company’s lifecycle, from seed stage through IPO. Since the firm’s founding in 1978, NEA’s experienced management team has invested in over 650 companies, of which more than 165 have gone public and more than 265 have been acquired. In the U.S., NEA has two offices in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and one in Menlo Park, California. In addition, New Enterprise Associates (India) Pvt. Ltd. has offices in Bangalore and Mumbai, India and New Enterprise Associates (Beijing), Ltd. has offices in Beijing and Shanghai, China. For additional information, visit nea.com.



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)1/8/2010 9:15:39 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
Internet Elite Predict the Media in 2010

groundreport.com



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)1/10/2010 5:30:30 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
Augmented reality will be mainstream in mobiles in 2010:

bit.ly



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)1/11/2010 2:42:15 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
Tom Siebel Startup Lands More Funding & High Profile Board Members...

managingautomation.com

techcrunch.com

c3welcome.com



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)1/11/2010 5:42:57 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
Oracle: Will Larry Ellison Buy The Golden State Warriors?

blogs.barrons.com



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)1/14/2010 3:51:40 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362478
 
Skype Founders Pondering IPO Don’t Need ’Love’ From Andreessen

By Edward Robinson and Joseph Galante

Jan. 14 (Bloomberg) -- One night in 2007, employees at Skype Technologies SA decided to send a message to their new corporate parent, EBay Inc. They picked up the desk of Henry Gomez, an EBay senior executive and Skype’s president, and moved it to a far corner of the company’s London office, says a former EBay senior manager.

The prank underlined how relations had deteriorated between Niklas Zennstrom, Skype’s co-founder and chief executive officer, and the online auction giant, which had acquired the startup two years earlier. In September 2007, he quit as CEO of the Internet phone company.

Two years later, Zennstrom and Janus Friis, his fellow Skype co-founder, have elbowed their way back into the company, Bloomberg Markets magazine reported in its February issue. In September, they waged a legal fight against EBay and a buyout group led by private-equity firm Silver Lake that had acquired control of Skype for $2 billion. The suits alleged that the consortium and EBay had unlawfully used the founders’ copyrighted software that they’d licensed to Skype. The consortium and EBay denied the allegation.

In November, Skype’s new owners cut Zennstrom and Friis in for a 14 percent stake and two board seats, and the duo dropped their lawsuits.

“They were not going to let Skype get away from them; that’s their baby,” says Yvette Alberdingk Thijm, a former senior content executive at Joost NV, an online video company that was also co-founded by Zennstrom, 43, and Friis, 33.

Largest IPO

Now Skype, which lets users call each other for free over the Internet, could be headed for the largest initial public offering of a technology company since Google Inc.’s 2004 IPO, says Paul Bard, director of research at Greenwich, Connecticut- based Renaissance Capital LLC.

Skype has soared in popularity since it started in 2003 and boasts about 548 million users worldwide, more than Facebook Inc., MySpace Inc. and Twitter Inc. combined. Skype earned $165 million in operating income in 2009, a 42 percent jump from 2008, Thomas Weisel Partners LLC estimates. If Skype increases its profits to $400 million by 2013, it could go public at a valuation of $4 billion, says Bard, who specializes in IPOs.

“Investors would have a big appetite for a profitable Internet IPO with its growth and scale,” he says.

Zennstrom and Friis will have to get along with some of the most powerful personalities in technology to deliver a hot IPO. Skype board member Marc Andreessen, the computer scientist who helped engineer the Web browser and usher in the Internet boom in the late 1990s, is working on the company’s growth strategy. A director at Hewlett-Packard Co., EBay and Facebook, Andreessen owns a Skype stake of about 5 percent through Menlo Park, California-based venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz LLC. Bloomberg LP, or a subsidiary of the company, is an investor in the Andreessen Horowitz fund.

“Ongoing Battle”

Egon Durban, head of European investments at Menlo Park- based Silver Lake, is also playing a lead role at the Internet company. And EBay CEO John Donahoe will have a say in Skype’s direction; his company retained a 30 percent stake.

Phillip Phan, a business professor at Johns Hopkins Carey Business School in Baltimore, foresees difficulties in the boardroom between Zennstrom and Friis and their fellow stakeholders.

“It’s obvious that the founders have an emotional interest in the company,” says Phan, who teaches corporate governance. “I suspect you will see an ongoing battle in the executive suite between the founders and the rest of the partners.”

Zennstrom and Friis refute this assertion. “That skepticism is entirely misplaced,” their spokesman Tom Rayner wrote in an e-mail. “Niklas and Janus have a huge and genuine respect for their new partners, with whom they are very much looking forward to working.”

“Not Grade School”

Andreessen, 38, says he expects the founders to bring zeal and innovation to the company they created, not acrimony. Seated in a sunlit conference room of his venture capital firm, with a view of the redwood-covered Santa Cruz Mountains, he says all of Skype’s owners share the same goal of making it a Google-caliber business.

“What’s great about the alignment of interests is that it doesn’t require everyone to love each other; it’s not grade school,” says Andreessen, who fires off comments with the speed of a machine gun. “If Niklas and Janus have six ideas on how the company can increase exponentially from where it’s at, I want to hear those.”

The new owners’ big idea is to expand Skype into the $203 billion market for corporate telecommunications. The company, which has about 700 employees, will form a new division with a sales force, product development managers and customer-support teams to offer businesses a suite of services and software.

New Rules

“We’re chasing a big opportunity,” says Skype CEO Josh Silverman, 40, former head of EBay’s Shopping.com unit.

The Internet company will have to gain the trust of corporations, which today largely rely on dedicated fiber-optic networks for their communications. Businesses may be unwilling to switch to a phone service built on the less-secure Internet, says Vanessa Alvarez, an analyst at Frost & Sullivan in Boston.

“Enterprises aren’t completely comfortable bringing in a consumer Internet company that’s mostly used for chitchat,” Alvarez says.

Skype has also lobbied the Federal Communications Commission as part of its strategy to become available on more mobile telephones. In September, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski proposed new rules to bar telecom carriers from blocking Internet traffic on their wireless networks, a problem that’s hindered Skype. The commission may vote on the initiative this year.

“Massive Threat”

A Skype IPO would mark a coming-of-age for Web-based social and professional networking companies such as Facebook and LinkedIn Corp. These so-called Web 2.0 startups are enlarging their online communities each month with millions of new members, who then recruit their friends, family members and colleagues to join. Skype may take market share from AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. much like Google and Craigslist Inc. snatched advertising from newspapers.

“What’s valuable about Skype is having half a billion connected users,” says Bill Gossman, an executive-in-residence at Mohr Davidow Ventures in Menlo Park. “It has a platform for delivering all these other services, and that’s a massive threat to traditional phone companies.”

Skype makes money by charging about 2 cents a minute for calls to nonservice users. Today, seven-year-old Skype is the No. 1 provider of cross-border calls, with 12 percent of the market, estimates Washington-based TeleGeography Research Group. The company also collects fees for voice-mail, text-messaging and other services.

Like Mr. Spock

Zennstrom and Friis set out to shake up traditional industries soon after they met in 1997. Zennstrom, then a manager at Swedish phone company Tele2 AB, hired Friis to work on the customer service desk.

Zennstrom, a married Swede with dual degrees in engineering physics and business administration from Uppsala University outside Stockholm, is analytical and disciplined and shuns small talk in meetings, former colleagues say. One former colleague likens Zennstrom to Mr. Spock, the cerebral Star Trek character who prizes logic above all else.

Friis, an unmarried Danish high school dropout, is a restless man who constantly taps out text messages on his smartphone during business meetings, even when addressing others, the former colleagues say.

In 1999, the pair collaborated with engineers in Tallinn, Estonia, to write the software for Kazaa, a technology that helped upend the music industry. The peer-to-peer MP3 file- sharing program akin to Napster allowed users to copy and distribute songs without paying for them.

Whitman’s Wager

The music industry and other entertainment groups sued Kazaa for copyright infringement; Zennstrom and Friis denied wrongdoing. In 2006, the duo, which no longer owned Kazaa, took part in a settlement of the litigation.

By then, Zennstrom and Friis had already created Skype using the same peer-to-peer technology that powered Kazaa. In September 2005, Skype had 54 million users, and Google and Yahoo! Inc. were negotiating to buy it.

Meg Whitman, a Harvard Business School graduate who had been CEO of EBay from its infancy in 1998, joined the chase for Skype. Whitman, 53, boosted EBay’s sales sevenfold to $3.3 billion in 2004 from four years earlier. As revenue and profit growth slowed in 2005, she wagered Skype could spur sales by letting buyers and sellers on its auction site talk for free with a mouse click.

Missed Flight

Whitman outbid Google and Yahoo and agreed in September 2005 to pay $2.6 billion for a money-losing startup. The CEO sweetened the deal with an additional $1.5 billion in incentives if Skype reached growth targets between 2006 and 2009.

“With the leader in Internet voice communications, we will create an extraordinarily powerful environment for business on the Net,” Whitman said in a statement in September 2005.

Whitman didn’t obtain total control of Skype. Zennstrom and Friis kept ownership of the underlying peer-to-peer software in a company called Joltid Ltd., which licensed the technology to Skype. And Zennstrom intended to continue running Skype as an independent enterprise.

“We didn’t look at this as selling the company,” Zennstrom said at a technology conference in Athens in October 2005, according to Bloomberg News. “We were looking for a partner, a company that would help us grow. We hit it off well with EBay.”

Imposing Discipline

Not for long. In late 2005, Whitman and her lieutenants flew from California to Estonia, the site of Skype’s engineering staff, for their first in-depth review of the company with Zennstrom and Friis. The two men didn’t show; they’d overslept in London and missed their flight, says a former senior EBay executive familiar with the meeting. After traveling across 10 time zones, Whitman and her team had to wait hours in Estonia for the founders.

As startup entrepreneurs, Zennstrom, Friis and their engineers seemed to chafe under EBay’s bureaucratic rules, the executive says. They were obliged to produce a stream of budgets, employee reviews and weekly metrics reports.

“They didn’t say it to us directly, but they kind of looked at us and said, ‘This is stupid,’” the executive says.

EBay grew frustrated at its inability to impose discipline on the Skype camp. EBay wanted the founders to embrace a long- term growth plan that generated profits. Instead, Skype’s engineers produced applications with limited interest to consumers, such as three-dimensional chess, as they chased the short-term growth targets set by the acquisition’s $1.5 billion incentive agreement, the former executives say. Rayner, the founders’ spokesman, declined to comment on their tenure at EBay.

Regaining Control

When Zennstrom quit as Skype’s CEO in September 2007, EBay paid the founders and other early Skype investors $530 million from the 2005 incentive agreement. EBay also wrote down the unit’s value by $900 million.

“The Skype deal didn’t make any sense,” says George Shipp, a money manager at BB&T Asset Management Inc. based in Richmond, Virginia, which holds 1.4 million EBay shares.

Whitman stepped down as CEO of EBay in March 2008 and is running for the Republican Party’s nomination in the 2010 California gubernatorial race. Sarah Pompei, Whitman’s spokeswoman, defended the Skype deal.

“Meg strongly believes this is and will continue to be a beneficial acquisition for EBay,” Pompei wrote in an e-mail.

Legal Battle

In early 2009, Zennstrom and Friis saw their chance to regain some control of Skype as Donahoe, Whitman’s successor, moved to spin it off. They joined with Elevation Partners LP, a Menlo Park-based private-equity firm, to bid for it. On Sept. 1, EBay instead agreed to sell 65 percent of Skype to the Silver Lake-Andreessen group, which includes the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, in a deal that valued the company at $2.7 billion.

In response, Joltid, Zennstrom and Friis’s holding company, sued in two courts in September. The suits claimed that EBay and the consortium misused the peer-to-peer software in making their deal and asked the courts to block them from proceeding. Eager to eliminate the legal distraction, the buyout group offered to bring Zennstrom and Friis into the deal.

On Nov. 5, the two agreed to invest $83 million, transfer ownership of their software from Joltid to Skype and drop their suits in exchange for a stake in the company worth $378 million. EBay reduced its equity position to 30 percent, and the buyout group decreased its stake to 56 percent from 65 percent.

“They created a big legal kerfuffle to edge themselves into the deal,” Mohr Davidow’s Gossman says.

Zennstrom and Friis disrupted the music industry with Kazaa and then earned a windfall by selling Skype to EBay. Now, they must prove that they’re entrepreneurs capable of winning corporate clients on the way to an IPO -- not just tech rebels who play by their own rules.

To contact the reporters on this story: Edward Robinson in San Francisco at edrobinson@bloomberg.net; Joseph Galante in San Francisco at jgalante3@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: January 14, 2010 00:00 EST



To: Sea Otter who wrote (182771)1/19/2010 4:38:08 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362478
 
Venture Veteran Doll Says Companies Will Turn to China for IPOs

By Ari Levy and Dakin Campbell

Jan. 19 (Bloomberg) -- Veteran venture capitalist Dixon Doll predicts that more U.S. technology companies will start holding initial public offerings in other countries as economic growth in Asia outpaces domestic expansion.

“In the next 10 years, I expect more portfolio companies to list on foreign exchanges,” said Doll, founder of Menlo Park, California-based firm DCM, in an interview last week. China “will become a big deal.”

The U.S. venture-capital industry is coming off its slowest two-year stretch for IPOs since the mid-1970s, with only 19 in 2008 and 2009, according to the National Venture Capital Association. Doll said that while U.S. companies may not flock to China in the next year or two, the world’s third-largest economy will be increasingly attractive for technology startups as its capital markets mature.

China’s gross domestic product will expand 8.5 percent this year and 9.3 percent next year, according to Bloomberg surveys of economists. That compares with average predictions for U.S. growth of 2.7 percent in 2010 and 3 percent in 2011, according to Bloomberg.

Doll, 67, said he expects 40 to 50 venture-backed companies in the U.S. to go public this year, because the “system is so constipated” from two years of inactivity. The financial crisis wiped out investment banks such as Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Bear Stearns Cos., and forced more than 850 hedge funds to shutter in the first nine months of 2009. That left fewer banks to lead IPOs and fewer investors to buy shares in them.

DCM, which also has offices in Beijing and Tokyo, was an investor in About.com, acquired by New York Times Co., and Clearwire Corp., the mobile-Web network company that went public in 2007. Current investments include BitTorrent, whose software allows users to download and share files over the Internet, and RockYou, which helps advertisers promote their brands on social networks. Of his firm’s IPOs, Doll said one or two will happen in China in the next two years.

To contact the reporters on this story: Ari Levy in San Francisco at alevy5@bloomberg.net; Dakin Campbell in San Francisco at dcampbell27@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: January 19, 2010 14:56 EST