SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: go4it who wrote (24054)11/2/1997 2:49:00 PM
From: Brander  Respond to of 35569
 
Good post Charles; this is the kind of debate that is needed on this thread--an intelligent examination of the issues without all the brutal, personal attacks. Keep it up, and I certainly invite EC (or anyone) to respond in a similar manner. An intelligent debate, without all the attacks, can only bring us all closer to the truth.

Brad



To: go4it who wrote (24054)11/2/1997 2:52:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
Charles: Good summary. I believe the recent drift lower in the stock price is due to the delays in the completion of the independent recovery program, the constant attacks on the company's credibility, and the short-sellers. While the public is scared out of their shares, the institutions keep adding to their positions.

Regarding the delays, while I don't like them, I see them as resulting from difficulties in achieving consistency in assay and recovery of the refractory ore. If there were nothing here, as the naysayers would have us believe, we would know by now, IMO. There is no way, IMO, that Behre Dolbear would have particpated in a scam for 3 years. Mr. Charters likes to point out that Kilborn was involved with Bre-X, but Kilborn did not do Chain of Custody on Bre-X ore.

IMO, the most significant press release to date by IPM was on September 29, 1997, when they reported "The independent verification program is complete." This company is about to make mining history, and I am fastening my seatbelt for the ride.



To: go4it who wrote (24054)11/2/1997 6:48:00 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 35569
 
The samples you show in that table were never approved of by Behre Dohlbear. A different group of samples were approved by Behre Dohlebear with a different grade..according to IPM. I asked Behre Dohlebear if they would make a statement about the samples and any work they had done for IPM and they DECLINED TO REPLY. I am a bit suspicious of their silence.

echarter@vianet.on.ca