Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dvdw© who wrote (58969)	12/15/2009 8:41:57 AM
From: dvdw©	Respond to of 217800

So what does this mean? XXXXXX& XXXXXXXX Produce the World’s First Full-Scale Turbo-Prop Aircraft Engine Model with 3D Printing The working turbo-prop was built in 188 parts. Watch Video It means that labor as a function within the value equation will shift once again. That is the conclusion that goes to the bank. The implications are enormous, because as the evolution of This Time proceeds, the ramifications will unfold. Building an aircraft engine in 188 parts, some may think whats the big deal? It is a huge deal, akin to the analogy of taking a covered wagon from St louis to LA versus taking a Jet. ------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Gibbs Racing Goes from CAD File to Production Part in 3 Days Learn how Joe Gibbs Racing used its XXXXXXX XXXXX to produce a new race car part in just three days. Learn about the process, materials used, and time and cost reduction. Comparative advantage is not the same as competitive advantage....would it be asking too much to consider that a process that used to take a semi annual budgets resources can now be accomplished in six days? Please.....get some new sources on this thread, we've got representatives from all over, and yet nothing but the same old tired rehash of missing in action bandwidth. inputs made here are routinely castigated for talking about Mouthpieces, and yet, the content seems to be so much of the same generalized production quality as to lower standards about world capital trends. lets accelerate this threads utility to a higher level than the program speak... if Gold is going to be money...its got to be particalized... the opportunity to return gold to money is real, but the solutions for doing so, with gold cast as bricks, are just plain inadequate.

To: dvdw© who wrote (58969)	12/15/2009 5:35:21 PM
From: TobagoJack	3 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 217800

my opinion of mauldin is as below, and i quote myself, mauldin is a closet wastrel inflationistic interventionist of the worst sort his whole "muddle through" economy thesis so whole-hearted featured missed by more than 10k miles in the opposite direction and his johnny-come-lately roubini-esque conversion betrays his limitations he is one who must fall before our sorry episode is truly over and the system is genuinely cleansed also, as he is a fan of stratfor, he is a neocon, and he is more than likely to not faith in the bible, earlier edition, or any other scriptures of similar publishing era above said, vented, yes, that the team usa is a paper tiger is not in doubt should team usa gdp be revised downward substantially, and closer to middle kingdom gdp, mathematically or otherwise by action of the market place, i fear the decoupling we fancy may be closer at hand, moving from 7-15 years away to 5-10 years on the close enough horizon unless of course beijing decides to revise its gdp proportionally for it is just all so few numbers to jiggle i find mauldin useful in effort to discern the beliefs of all those he talks to, and should they talk more similarly then not on commonly-held beliefs, i feel a bit more comforted and assured, especially when and if i have a different take in above way mauldin is as useful as gartman, iow, both tools, i.e. dipsticks :0)