Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (536668)	12/15/2009 3:06:19 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1577920

you think if the libs really cared about the planet they would be happy that AGW is a scam. But they aren't happy...hmmm must not be about warming

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (536668)	12/15/2009 4:23:17 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577920

"Deny deny deny ..." No, facts facts facts... "Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal." Wow. Someone suggests a boycott. How decidedly unAmerican... "even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!" Horrors! Someone engaging in hyperbole! This has never happened before! What is the world coming too? " The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't." Taking stuff out of context. Again. "Like I said, don't try and hide their motives." They are not trying to hide anything. This is why bloggers aren't capable of peer review. Even if they were knowledgeable of the issues, and there is no sign of that, they have an agenda and are willing to cherry pick, distort and just plain make shit up to advance it. As you have amply illustrated.