Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Saito who wrote (971)	11/2/1997 4:13:00 PM
From: go4it	Respond to of 3744

Robert, This is where I have talked to you before : www4.techstocks.com Your response : www4.techstocks.com <<so why do you feel the need to lower yourself to support your opinion with useless verbal volleys?>> because I sometimes let my temper get in the way of my better judgment. <<why do you uphold your opinion on a higher level than everyone else?>> I certainly don't try to. I simply put my ideas out and hope to debate them in an attempt to evaluate where I may be mistaken in my judgement. I agree that arguments should try to avoid the mud slinging unfortunately it has become a part of life. Please judge what is said rather than how it is said. So many have defended and laughed about how blunt and forward ec can be. For the time being, out of courtousy, I ask that you attribute that characteristic to myself as well until I have had time to address the mud slinging nature that you seem to believe that I have. Here is something for your reading pleasure regarding the subject at hand. techstocks.com techstocks.com Good Luck RS

To: Robert Saito who wrote (971)	11/2/1997 7:53:00 PM
From: Theo	Respond to of 3744

<<.arrogance runs cheap and plentiful on the si threads doesn't it? shame, shame for being exactly what you criticize...your arguments lose credibility when you sling the slime...BTW- why not ask claude about VEC and toscana and NPA? >> Arrogance: the false feeling of superiority.

To: Robert Saito who wrote (971)	11/2/1997 8:58:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 3744

Anotherone whom can't understand me and specifics that I talk about? I see that negatives work two ways, one for naysayers; one way for others. Prepare for a real shockwave to hit the mining industry:<<too much gobbledygoop for my feeble brain to keep track of...sorry (but its more than ironic to know charles marsh is invested in ipm anyways!) >> Do you understand that? NEWTECH LEACHING SYSTEM ...Break(through! Chucauspaekstruthattheendofthestoryaswellasatthebegining. Now what is hard about that? Check the IPMCF.com webpage and read up here's a link: exchange2000.com or go direct to ipmcf.com