SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (15347)12/15/2009 9:16:33 PM
From: russet2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86355
 
In reality it's the other way around. CO2 goes up after the temperature goes up. In other words warming is causing the increase in CO2.

The 100 year focus is a complete red herring given past warmings have been far greater than the present one, the present warming is being caused by natural factors, and the current warming is statistically irrelevant when looked at in context of the history of warming and cooling cycles of the earth.

In short we have had much higher levels of CO2 in the past and been warmer and colder than present with higher and lower CO2 levels.

Message 26177574

Study the graphs detailed in the post above and learn about the paleoclimate record.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (15347)12/15/2009 9:59:30 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 86355
 
That is an inaccurate perception:

Almost everyone agrees that CO2 and temperature are correlated in the historical record using ice cores and other methods.

Very few people are fooled by this deception.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (15347)12/16/2009 10:56:39 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 86355
 
wrong you have it backward, most Reds try to fool people with that, right Comrade ?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News