Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (537008)	12/17/2009 1:46:21 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579790

> If true that he's not sexually addicted, then he's a fairly stupid man. He's really messed up his life. Bill Clinton is not a stupid man. But he allowed his pecker to destroy his presidency. Most men, at some point in their lives, are not very wise in controlling their dicks. That doesn't make them "sex addicts" (which I seriously doubt is the name of a legitimate form of addiction). It just means that at a point in time, the self control isn't there. I tend to agree with what you're saying. Here's one explanation of sexual addition.......one they may fit Tiger: "The National Council on Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity has defined sexual addiction as “engaging in persistent and escalating patterns of sexual behavior acted out despite increasing negative consequences to self and others.” In other words, a sex addict will continue to engage in certain sexual behaviors despite facing potential health risks, financial problems, shattered relationships or even arrest." psychcentral.com