Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (24072)	11/2/1997 6:45:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

At the AGM they announced (it might be in the 2 officers messages) that the silver and lead were used as regents and because the silver is a item in the regents that they can not put out any silver numbers. I think most of us there heard this. So what: <<...They are using platinum to collect platinum? It would have been ok to say that first....>> EChucaupt2(butnotAG)

To: E. Charters who wrote (24072)	11/2/1997 7:20:00 PM
From: Theo	Respond to of 35569

<<Proprietary or not do the shareholders not own this assay method?>> Since your not a shareholder, I would have to say thats none of your business. Anyone that really wanted to know that answer would have had it before shooting off their big mouth tho. Your best freind and personal savior, Theo

To: E. Charters who wrote (24072)	11/2/1997 9:42:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35569

E. Charters: I agree with you that a good SEM trace should be able to show some evidence of the goodies if they are indeed in the range of more than 10 PPM (about 1/3 of an Ounce per ton). You will not see with an SEM clusters of 45 atoms, however, for this you need an atomic force microscope (I think that is what these are called nowadays). By the way, aion microprobe trace with a well calibrated ppiece of equipment should also be able (after hard and arduous work) yield traces in the 10 to 30 PPM range. Why it was not done? Well here I am a little puzzled mysefl, since in their 1995 annual report that showed some traces, but I got into big and bitter arguments with CL as to traces of what these were. On one hand, CL was claiming that Te was interferring with fire assay but on the other hand those traces showed no Te, which of course, CL then stated that the traces were already on prills (but the pictures were not). So I gave up on this avenue to find what is really going on. Keep on digging maybe you will find something. Zeev