SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (27217)12/18/2009 11:28:13 AM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36921
 
Of course, the wingnuts will claim that NOAA and NASA both colluded to fudge the data. They're all communists out to "zap and impurify our precious bodily fluids". I heard that NASA was behind fluoridation of drinking water.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (27217)12/18/2009 10:51:31 PM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36921
 
Wharfie, thanks for posting that information to show that contrary to Global Warm-monger theory, the number of tornadoes is way below expectations.

The section saying that Arctic sea ice is increasing was interesting too, which is consistent with my reglaciation theory.

<November sea ice extent in the Arctic 3rd lowest on record
November 2009 Northern Hemisphere sea ice extent was the 3rd lowest since satellite measurements began in 1979, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC). Only 2006 and 2007 saw lower arctic sea ice extent. During 10-day period in the first half of November, arctic ice extent decreased below the 2007 record minimum, but rose above record minimum levels by the middle of the month.
>

The Denialist head-line twisted the information to make it look like a near record ice melt in the Arctic, but the extreme mathematicians among us can see that what it says is that 2006 and 2007 had less ice but the trend is for more ice with November 2009 up from those lows.

Mqurice