Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (537364)	12/18/2009 1:36:14 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578927

Why the fascination w/ Tiger? Because he's jekyll and hyde. Especially by folks who said Clinton doing the same thing was nobodies business? Who said its nobody's business? What we said was he shouldn't be impeached for it.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (537364)	12/18/2009 2:28:01 PM
From: one_less	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578927

"Especially by folks who said Clinton doing the same thing was nobodies business?" What same thing? Tiger never asked any of us to support him in his philandering, he never used his position to make false claims that would destroy the women he was involved with, nor did he ask us to support him in his claims of innocence while attacking such women. Tiger never lied to my face and yours on national television. Whatever he did, he didn't do it as my representative. My only comment is, 'tsk, what a shame.' Sorry his golden record has to be tarnished, his relationship with his wife has to be damaged, and his winning streak at the bank may be dampened. I don't know what to say for the other women. Surely they got involved with eyes wide open. Did Tiger attempt to use the power of his position to defraud the courts, perjure himself, or violate oaths of office?