SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (537793)12/21/2009 6:36:03 AM
From: Taro  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576357
 
The ice melting on the South Pole is negative, Ted.

More is added to the inland ice than is melting off the coasts there.
That's why we should move some of those poor polar bears 20kkm down south :)

Taro



To: tejek who wrote (537793)12/21/2009 12:17:35 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576357
 
Ted, > That should be past tense.

I let you know when it is.

> The scientists who believe GW is happening point to the rising global temps and the melting ice at the two poles.

LOL, "hide the decline."

Tenchusatsu



To: tejek who wrote (537793)12/21/2009 12:28:23 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576357
 
"Its you all who attribute every climatic event to GW."

Which is why he is so enraptured with the "climate change" phraseology. He has been trying to pin all kinds of nefarious uses to it. Although he was taken off-stride when it was pointed out that the term was first coined by the Right. He sort of sputtered and blustered for a while. He seems to have recovered, though.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News