Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (15621)	12/21/2009 6:07:31 PM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86355

Yes, agreed. That's why I'm in favor of not manipulating the data through choosing the most favorable baseline period. Instead, whatever period of data you use, we should always use the mean as the baseline for temperature anomalies. I really don't like that they pick and choose a baseline period upon which to show temp anomalies. It is manipulative. Anyway, from the data we have, we clearly see the warming trend over the 130 years. That can't be denied. Plus, it is pretty clear that CO2 is correlated to temperature, although causality hasn't been proven.