SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (538028)12/22/2009 1:24:51 AM
From: Joe NYC1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576159
 
We go around and around on this issue and get nowhere. CO2 in limited quantities is good; in excess, its a greenhouse gas and a pollutant. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

CO2 is such a weak greenhouse gas and the climate science is in state of infancy that it is not clear when or if ever (assuming all the fossil fuels were burned) that there would be an excess.

And how can possibly a life giving element, CO2, supporting all life on planet be a pollutant?

Well, take a president Obama who appoints complete imbeciles into EPA and a fuel for life on planet becomes a pollutant.



To: tejek who wrote (538028)12/22/2009 11:30:31 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576159
 
Ted, > Gassification produces noxious/toxic by products including large quantities of CO2 th at harm the environment.

You might want to go back to grade school. Even if we dug up all the coal and oil from the planet and burned it, the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere would not reach any level of toxicity that would actually harm life.

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News