Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (538082)	12/22/2009 11:00:50 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576973

"You are mistaken" Are you claiming you didn't make this post? Projecting again? "No you don't. I consider taking stuff out of context and selectively editing a form of lying. You consider it a killer argument." Out of context... Ten: "I do that to people's posts just to have fun." Message 26182353 Now, my post was in response to this CJ, > And you wonder why I call y'all liars? Guess I no longer have to wonder ... LOL Tenchusatsu Message 26182245 Not this one. CJ, > Like, for example, the "hide the decline" which you find so nefarious. When the paper was published, they showed the data with the decline, explained why it was wrong and presented their fixed version. So it was hidden out in the open with full explanations. I like that. They change some data, then call it "Fixed." I do that to people's posts just to have fun. Never thought it would actually be considered suitable for scientific studies ... Tenchusatsu Message 26182186 Like you pretended. It was you who took stuff out of context and then accused me of doing so. And then there was this. I'm not backing up for a sec, a fraction of a sec or an unmeasurable moment, let alone a minute. Whatever can be said about those women... tejek, bentway, and combjelly have not earned the right to stand over them in judgement, quite to the contrary. While I am at it, how does this issue get priority over truly tragic suffering and hardship in the world. Tiger gets embarrassed and his million dollar add deals start falling through. waah waah waah [sarcasm] Some starry eyed girls get caught in his lime light and act silly, oh my. Not even for a moment will I back up. Those three are in no position ... and its a silly thing to waste bandwidth on in the first place but when they do, I see the same sexist bigotry I see when they are bashing Palin and I'm not willing to give it a pass in either case ... makes me sick t'ma stomach. Message 26182816 I said nothing derogatory about women. Even Tenchu mentioned that. Yet you still persisted. I'm sure in your eyes you are the model of honor to women but to an objective observer you are a judgemental bigot who tries to put women down into what ever place you think they belong... skank, madam, conventional prostitute, conceirge, madam... Its all so taxonomical isn't it CJ Message 26183123 I admit that I did call Rachel more of a concierge. I wasn't aware that was putting women down. But you seem to have a novel dictionary. I never called any women any of the other names you claim. I did point out that I didn't think those labels applied. Bottom line. You lied. And lied repeatedly. And you have been dancing around and pretending you didn't. Instead of manning up.