SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (538100)12/22/2009 11:27:33 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576807
 
"Except, Oxygen is a major element in athmosphere and CO2 is almost a trace element."

So? That doesn't change anything. You need trace levels of selenium in your diet. But it doesn't take much more than that trace to turn it into a poison.

"There is no danger to plant life when concentrations increase. Just the opposite. Plant growth accelerates."

Which is why plants can be a carbon sink. But that doesn't change the fact that increasing CO2 concentrations also increases the greenhouse effect.

"Meaning, if you want to make planet more "green" (literally), you would want higher CO2 concentrations..."

Invalid conclusion. There have been massive extinctions in the past due to rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere. The planet did wind up more green in the long run, but it was sort of a dismal brown for a while...



To: Joe NYC who wrote (538100)12/22/2009 11:54:14 AM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576807
 
CO2 rising, so what?

What's really preposterous is the claim, that a global warming trend should follow a preceding rise in CO2.
As far as we know from studying data on hand, that has never been the case before!
The CO2 rises as far as we know - not guess - traced the warming periods and not vice versa in all the warming periods we have been able to document so far.
And CJ knows that perfectly well.

/Taro