SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (39933)12/28/2009 3:16:23 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Your making up your own definition, or taking a faulty one from someone else. The existence of a monopoly is simply not incompatible with the existence of a free market, as long as that monopoly came about through free market means and faces at least the theoretical possibility of competition, without any law or other type of force used to stop the competition.



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (39933)12/28/2009 5:19:38 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 

Subsidy is subsidy......

Faulty logic.

Your trying to prove A is B, that payments to these companies are subsidies.

Your argument for it is C=C, Subsidy=Subsidy. Sure, I agree that C equals C, but you have to tie it in somehow to make it relevant.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News