SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (539349)12/29/2009 1:42:25 PM
From: RetiredNow1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577883
 
Well, I agree that the unfunded liability is a big problem, but don't forget that Bush added to that problem with his Medicare Prescription drug plan.

The funny thing is that I would bet my house that had McCain been elected, we'd be running an almost equally large deficit as we are right now.

Take a look at the website at this link:
usgovernmentspending.com

Notice how Pensions, Health Care, and Defense are our government's largest expenses. From that first spending breakdown, you can click on the chart icons to the right and watch the spending trajectory. You'll notice that defense spending has increased the most through today, but will decline under Obama. Health care and pensions, however, are projected to continue increasing dramatically.








To: i-node who wrote (539349)12/31/2009 4:10:33 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1577883
 
The reality is that this debt (and it IS a real debt, just one our government has chosen not to openly discuss) is the problem.

Its the primary problem, but it isn't real debt. Canceling or reducing future government programs isn't default.

That could be considered a technicality since the programs won't be canceled and are very unlikely to be slashed (at least until they actually causes a major current crisis) its effect is pretty much the same as having a lot of debt, but then you could just change my statement in the last paragraph to "technically it isn't debt".

Also another technicality, a lot of Republicans supported the creation and expansion of entitlements, so its not like the GOP can slip all blame for the spending, debt, and unfunded future spending liabilities from them, but your larger point is true, they where passed primarily by the Democrats. I'm really mostly in agreement with your post despite three paragraphs mostly expressing disagreement.