SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (71895)12/29/2009 7:22:06 PM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Respond to of 74559
 
Who do they blame for forcing them to smoke tobacco, which they do in vast amounts even though the air is already disgusting from other pollution? <"If you spoke to the average 20 or 30-something Chinese person they would say the British forced us to take opium. It is established as part of the historical story." >

That shows how clueless is the average 20 or 30 year old Chinese person if we believe the writer.

You can lead a Chinese [the average 20 or 30-something] to water but you can't make them think.

It is not possible to force hordes of people to smoke either tobacco or opium, or drink booze for that matter. The British could force the landing of opium on the wharves and distribution to shops, but they couldn't force people to go and buy it.

Opium was a common product around the world in the 19th century. Melbourne's library has shipping schedules for opium and other goods into Australia. There was a lot of the stuff.

The harm from opium was vastly less than the present harm from tobacco, but they seem unworried about tobacco and are certainly not executing suppliers. Deng Xiaoping was a big smoker. en.wikipedia.org

Laughable: <“Nobody has the right to speak ill of China’s judicial sovereignty,” said spokeswoman Jiang Yu. > Jiang obviously has little idea about freedom of speech and thinking. In fact, we do. And, in fact, China's boss thugs have plenty to say about the decisions of New Zealand and other countries. Jiang obviously thinks they rule the world and can tell other people what they can and can't say.

While there are hordes of people held hostage in China [about 1.3 billion] that's only a small proportion of Earth's total 6 billion.

Mqurice



To: elmatador who wrote (71895)12/30/2009 9:51:36 AM
From: Arran Yuan  Respond to of 74559
 
It is more about difference of morality norms than of laws among the two countries, imho.

If a countyr has to resort to law to meddle with moral matters, the population's dna pool has accumulated too much detrimental mutations, leading inevitably to self destruction.