SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (23900)12/31/2009 4:36:30 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Obama criticized on airline incident when Bush wasn't

There's a big difference between Bush and obumble, and this is why obumble deserves the criticism...

Bush was making an effort, he was sincere and showed legitimate passion about his attempts to protect us from terrorists... it's plain human nature to cut someone a break when we know the individual has been making a sincere effort... on the other hand, obumble clearly is more concerned about the rights of terrorists than the safety of Americans, so there is no break to be cut, any incident that can be linked to his intentional neglect simply becomes evidence of his ongoing ineptness... this is a very natural human response to how people are perceived, and very well deservedly since the perception is very typically highly accurate...

GZ



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (23900)12/31/2009 8:36:35 AM
From: jlallen2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 103300
 
Nope....no hypocrisy at all. There was never any doubt about Bush's determination to wage the GWOT. That is the difference.



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (23900)12/31/2009 12:07:18 PM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
probably because Obama said there is no terrorism only man made disasters. No one but wackos like you bought that