SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (272462)1/1/2010 2:37:07 PM
From: SARMAN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The only clear and present danger to our country is the Zionists and Israel.

Would you agree with me that, as our enemy, we have the right to kill him?'
YES, we should be have the right to killed the enemy. The enemy is Israel and the Zionists.

Can we kill those people who have declared they are in engaged in a war of conquest with the United States (regardless of their odds of success)?
Not if it means that American men and women are going to die for something that will never happen.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (272462)1/3/2010 12:29:04 AM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Not so fast their Hawk. I have suggested to Lindy Bill that Cook Islands and New Zealand should annex Hawaii as rightfully part of ancestral lands. <Can we kill those people who have declared they are in engaged in a war of conquest with the United States (regardless of their odds of success)? >

I'd have to give a "No" to that suggestion.

But my plan of "attack" wasn't to sink the USA Pacific Fleet and conquer the USA, so much as persuade those affected that we should form a union in the New United Nations [new constitution fit for the 21st century].

There's altogether too much talk of killing, especially when it might involve me as you have suggested and as Sarmaniac's Islamic Jihad is planning.

Mqurice