To: mishedlo who wrote (106022 ) 1/3/2010 1:14:32 PM From: skinowski 5 Recommendations Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 116555 Mish, I participate in an email circular where your posts get a lot of attention, from time to time. This last one, not unexpectedly, brought up some disagreements. I would like to post here (with author's permission) some comments critical of your views. I think some of the insights are most interesting. Some of the language may be rather direct, but I'm sure it was written with constructive intentions - otherwise, I wouldn't bring it here. ................. ................. I disagree, and I'm not an Islamophobe. I've worked closely with the Pakistani military in Pakistan. I have also spent a good amount of time in Kosovo, helping Kosovar Albanians (Muslims) against Serbian Christians. And I've read a good bit of their book. Nor am I a war-monger. I support military action under some circumstances, but I've put my hindquarters where my mouth is. Not to put too fine a point on it, but Shedlock's perspective is completely nonsensical. I'd use a more pungent descriptor, but that would be impolite. What Shedlock is advocating is no more than a projection of his own policy preferences. Same for Michael Scheuer (and Pat Buchanan). Is it really logical to believe that Muslim extremists hate us because we have troops in Germany and Japan? Please. By and large, the reason the extremists are willing to waste their lives to take ours is that the US is an easy symbol for everything that enrages them. We are, in a very real sense, the epitome of the West. If it weren't us, they'd have to find someone else to hate. The real reasons behind their hatred are internal. But, as every teenager can tell you, it's easier to blame someone else than it is to deal with your own problems. Islam pitches itself as the successor to the two earlier Middle Eastern revealed religions. But for the past five hundred years or so it has failed to deliver the goods--political, social and (most importantly) material benefits in the here-and-now. The story of Islam since at least the Reconquista has been one of stagnation, internal decay, collapse, and withdrawal. Meanwhile, the formerly backward Western countries of the Dal al-Harb are leaving them in the dust in every metric. The governments in the Middle East, with one exception, are all oppressive and intolerant (as are the governments of most, but not all, of the Muslim countries). The model for authoritarian governments is to allow a certain degree of economic freedom in exchange for quiet on the political front. But the governments in the Middle East can't afford to buy off their people any longer. The contrast between the promises of Islam and the present political and material reality creates a lot of cognitive dissonance, particularly in certain affluent and educated types. The same sort of folks who have always provided the leadership for revolutions and insurgencies. Extremist Muslims (Salafists and Takfiris as the most virulent examples) tell themselves that, if only they could follow Muhammad's guidance more closely, things would be different. But it's tough to live by the letter of a law set down in the Seventh Century when you're surrounded by a modern world full of unveiled women, Scotch whisky, and iPods. Maybe the most self-disciplined can manage it, barely, but most people simply aren't going to forego basic pleasures now in the hope that they might get a better reward later. Faced with the fact that they can't persuade their compatriots to toe the line, and that they can't kill enough of them to force them to do so, the extremists need an external target. If only they could destroy the source of the temptation, then things would be different... That's why they hate us. Shedlock's prescription is far more likely to encourage extremist behavior than to discourage it. Put slightly differently, if there's any lesson to be learned from the world, it's that prey behavior encourages predation.