SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (82026)1/5/2010 1:11:20 PM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"It's the ones that you are calling names that are rescuing babies from literally being thrown into trash bins."

"That's ridiculous, emotional babbling."

No that's a fact. Everyones a wacko who disagrees with you. "Wacko, wacko, wacko,": that's all you can say and it's indicative of your lack of maturity. The early "Wacko" Christians distinguished themselves from their Pagan neighbors by rescuing unwanted babies that were left to die. It remains a hallmark of Christians today that they stand up and defend those who are unable to defend themselves. Wacko, wacko, wacko. Go figure. Today; innocent human beings are killed at all stages of pregnancy for any reason at all (but mostly for the sake of convenience) and their bodies are treated as medical waste and disposed of like trash.

<<it's the people and practices that YOU defend who are killing full term babies by thrusting a pair of scissors into their brain during the act of birth>>

"More poppycock... or (actually) outright lying."

Again, on the contrary, it's a sad and horrific fact. Partial birth abortion is a monstrous reality and is justified by arguing that the unborn are not human beings. See next point for YOUR complicity in this.
youtube.com

<<<the book you cited demonstrates the scientific fact that a New Human Being comes into existence at the point of fertilization.>>>

"What it says is: ""7. Fertilization: Beginning a new organism"""

Is this "new organism" a Human Being? You have consistently argued that it is not. In fact you have claimed that it is not a "new organism" but that it is the mother's body.

<The reason that one does not theologically argue ensoulment with people who do not believe that souls exist should be obvious:>

"Who would that be?"

People who do not believe that souls exist.

<It's too bad that your apparent hatred for me personally won't allow you to engage in any kind of reasonable conversation>

"That's simple projection of your own emotional state... as shown over and over."

It's not projection when you go out of your way to mention my name with an epithet in virtually every one of your posts. I'm in your head so much you are going to start charging me rent.

"It's well documented that you "bail out"..."

Just tired of the obfuscation and name calling that's all.

You may now return to your regularly scheduled program.