Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Conquest Resources Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NYBob1 who wrote (8)	1/4/2010 12:50:35 PM
From: NYBob1	Respond to of 16

I had discovered, through a reliable source, the real reason why Goldcorp acquired Gold Eagle Mines located directly to the west of their property in july 2008, for 1.3B. It had come to Goldcorp's attention that a major gold mining company, one my source had been working for at the time, was buying up Gold Eagle shares in order to launch a takeover bid for the company. Upon hearing this Goldcorp freaked out and immediately launched their own takeover bid for Gold Eagle Mines and ended up paying top dollar for the property. The reason I bring this up is after hearing about this it got me thinking. If the thought of a major mining company moving in on Godcorp's properties and subsequently challenging their supremacy in the Red Lake region was what caused them to spend 1.3B to prevent that from happening what would they do if they were to discover Conquest was being pursued by a major gold mining company on the east side of Goldcorp's property. Not to say, this is the case, however, this little share purchase recently by Mr. Kearney might be interpreted by some as what poker players like to refer to as a TELL. In other words has he tipped his hand with regards to what the future might hold for Conquest Resources. I believe he has. JMHO of course. gCalf, from another CQR forum