SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: orkrious who wrote (234996)1/4/2010 4:12:41 PM
From: stockman_scottRespond to of 306849
 
Krugman Sees 30-40% Chance of U.S. Recession in 2010 (Update2)

By Steve Matthews

Jan. 4 (Bloomberg) -- Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman said he sees about a one-third chance the U.S. economy will slide into a recession during the second half of the year as fiscal and monetary stimulus fade.

“It is not a low probability event, 30 to 40 percent chance,” Krugman said today in an interview in Atlanta, where he was attending an economics conference. “The chance that we will have growth slowing enough that unemployment ticks up again I would say is better than even.”

Krugman, 56, said growth will slow as the Federal Reserve ends purchases of securities, the Obama administration’s $787 billion stimulus program winds down and companies stop rebuilding depleted stockpiles.

The Princeton University professor joined Harvard’s Martin Feldstein and Columbia’s Joseph Stiglitz, another Nobel laureate, in sounding an alarm for the world’s largest economy during the annual meeting of the American Economic Association. Feldstein yesterday called the fading stimulus “a serious cloud,” and Stiglitz said growth won’t be “robust” soon.

While inventory rebuilding may have raised U.S. growth to a more than 4 percent annual pace in the fourth quarter, this year’s rate will be “more like 2 percent,” with the risk of outright declines late in the year, Krugman said. Unemployment “ends the year a little higher than it began,” Krugman said.

Survey of Economists

Krugman’s forecast is more pessimistic than the median estimate of 58 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News in early December, which called for a 2.6 percent expansion this year following a 2.5 percent contraction in 2009.

The Federal Reserve’s plan to end purchases of $1.25 trillion of mortgage-backed securities and about $175 billion of federal agency debt in March could spur an increase in mortgage rates and lead to declines in home sales and prices, Krugman said.

“Probably mortgage rates go up some,” he said. “New home sales are still pretty weak and new home construction is a joke by the standards of a few years ago. But they probably falter.”

The Fed should consider buying another $2 trillion in assets to reduce unemployment, Krugman said, citing research by Joseph Gagnon, a former Fed staff economist.

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and his fellow policy makers cut the benchmark interest rate almost to zero in December 2008 while switching to asset purchases and credit programs as the main policy tools. The central bank has expanded its balance sheet to $2.24 trillion from $858 billion at the start of 2007.

Manufacturing Expands

U.S. manufacturing expanded in December at the fastest pace in more than three years, aided by government-assisted rebounds in housing and auto-making, a report today from the Institute of Supply Management indicated.

The ISM’s factory index rose to 55.9, the highest level since April 2006. Readings greater than 50 signal expansion. Construction spending dropped for a seventh month, the Commerce Department said in a separate release today.

“Stimulus we know starts fading and goes negative around the middle of the year,” Krugman said. “Inventory bounce, which is driving things right now, will fade out as inventory bounces do.”

Any sales by the Fed of mortgage-backed securities as part of a so-called “exit strategy” from record stimulus could increase mortgage rates by 1 percentage point and impede the recovery, Krugman said.

The rate for 30-year fixed U.S. home loans rose to 5.14 percent in the week ended Dec. 31, the fourth straight weekly increase and highest level since August, according to mortgage finance company Freddie Mac.

Stock Rebound

Krugman said he disagreed with former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan’s view that the surge in stock prices last year reduces the need for additional government stimulus. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index rallied 23 percent in 2009, its best performance since 2003.

“People are a lot poorer than they were four years ago,” Krugman said. “Consumption is not that dependent on stock values, much more so on housing values.”

Advanced economies in Europe and Asia also face the risk of a renewed recession, Krugman said.

“The double dip issue is present everywhere in the advanced world,” he said. “We all have stimulus programs that kind of fade out.”

The U.S. dollar may weaken “a little bit” against other advanced country currencies, he said.

‘Extended Period’

At its last meeting in December, the central bank’s Federal Open Market Committee said economic activity had picked up, while affirming a pledge to keep the target interest rate exceptionally low for an “extended period.”

“Historically, financial crises are very, very prolonged,” Krugman said. While the U.S. banking system has “stabilized,” it hasn’t returned to normal, he said.

“Small business is still very constrained in its borrowing,” he said. “That is not a good thing. We do not have a fully healthy, functional financial system.”

The economy expanded at a 2.2 percent annual rate in the third quarter. The nation’s jobless rate stood at 10 percent in November, up from 9.8 percent in September. The rate will probably rise to 10.1 percent in December, according to the median estimate in a Bloomberg News survey of economists ahead of the Labor Department’s report on Jan. 8.

To contact the reporters on this story: Steve Matthews in Atlanta at smatthews@bloomberg.net;

Last Updated: January 4, 2010 14:59 EST



To: orkrious who wrote (234996)1/4/2010 8:37:34 PM
From: Think4YourselfRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
"Personally, I would like to see a different outcome. I'd like to see a new birth of intelligence,..."

Good luck with that, because there are no signs of it happening.



To: orkrious who wrote (234996)1/5/2010 9:25:01 AM
From: Pogeu MahoneRespond to of 306849
 
UBS whistle-blower gets no reprieve from judge
Birkenfeld unable to have sentence delayed or reduced
By Curt Anderson, Associated Press | January 5, 2010

MIAMI - A federal judge refused yesterday to postpone prison or consider a lighter sentence for a former Swiss banker-turned-informant who helped launch a massive US tax evasion investigation into banking giant UBS AG.

The decision by US District Judge William Zloch means Bradley Birkenfeld must report to prison Friday to begin a sentence of three years and four months, which is longer than what prosecutors had sought. Zloch also refused to schedule a hearing on whether to reconsider the sentence. Birkenfeld pleaded guilty last year to a fraud conspiracy charge.

Prosecutors credit Birkenfeld, 44, with exposing wrongdoing at UBS and leading investigators to thousands of suspected American tax cheaters who hid assets in the Swiss bank’s accounts. But they also said Birkenfeld failed to disclose his crimes, including his work for a California real estate magnate who pleaded guilty in 2007 to tax charges.

Prosecutors declined to comment on Zloch’s ruling. The Washington-based National Whistleblowers Center, whose attorneys are representing Birkenfeld, said in a statement that putting such a prominent informant in prison could “kill the goose that laid the golden eggs’’ by deterring others from coming forward.

“If the [Obama] administration is actually serious about going after offshore tax evasion they need to be encouraging whistle-blowers, not throwing them in jail,’’ said Dean Zerbe, special counsel at the Whistleblowers Center.

At Birkenfeld’s sentencing hearing in August, prosecutors said they may seek a sentence reduction if he continues to cooperate, but to date have not done so.

Birkenfeld, a US citizen who lived in Switzerland for 15 years, has been described as the most important informant in the US probe of tax evasion and secrecy at UBS and other banks. Armed with his disclosures, US officials reached a deferred prosecution agreement with UBS last February in which the bank agreed to pay a $780 million fine and reveal names of some 150 clients.

Later in 2009, UBS agreed under US pressure to release names of 4,450 wealthy Americans suspected of using secret accounts to evade billions of dollars in US taxes. None of those names has been made public, but several other former UBS clients have been prosecuted in the US based on the initial disclosures.

Birkenfeld has applied with the Internal Revenue Service for a whistle-blower reward that, if approved, could bring him tens of millions of dollars, if not more.



To: orkrious who wrote (234996)1/5/2010 10:04:36 AM
From: yard_manRespond to of 306849
 
Re this:

>>The religion of the Futility Economy is Techno-Triumphalism, which is the belief that an endless sequence of magic tricks performed by shaman scientists can defeat the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which rules the universe -- which true scientists ought to know cannot be defeated. Their colleagues, the shaman economists believe in parallel magic tricks, such as the idea that increased borrowing can "solve" a problem of runaway over-indebtedness. These are the actions that currently engage the people in charge of things in our society.<<

OTOH -- the folks who are predicting outright doom because of the "numbers" of people on the planet are also just as wrong as are the people who think there are no technological helps --- there are -- but our government cannot choose the winners.

As someone who teaches physics -- I am very weary of the 2nd law of thermodynamics being invoked to explain all manner of things it doesn't. It is not a statement about societal tendencies or an instant debunk to evolution (though I don't accept Darwin's theory as "fact.")