SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (541129)1/5/2010 7:26:03 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575538
 
Thankfully, Britain protects convicts from Christian exposure.

I guess its inappropriate in a secular jail format too. I mean its vulgar to speak of Christianity openly in a secular scoiety. We can talk about the 13 or so women Tiger bedded but we have to have standards.


Christian Evicted From Rapist's Cell

Posted by Van Helsing at January 5, 2010 10:40 AM

The decay has reached the point that merely being a Christian around a rapist is regarded as a human rights violation:

An atheist rapist has complained that his human rights were breached by having to share a prison cell with a Christian inmate.

Barman Steven Relf, 40, was jailed indefinitely after admitting raping two women he targeted when he served them drinks in a pub.

Police branded him a "sexual predator" and said he could have had as many as 40 victims. …

A source said Relf was "furious" at having to share at Manchester Prison with the Christian convict and wanted him to be "evicted". …

The other inmate was later transferred.


There was a time when Christianity was seen as an avenue of redemption for criminals. Now it's an ideological crime from which atheist rapists must be protected.

Maybe the moonbat authorities should have left the Christian in with the rapist, in hopes the rapist would convert him to self-indulgent nihilistic atheism, the official state religion.

On tips from Frank W and Chad.

moonbattery.com



To: tejek who wrote (541129)1/5/2010 8:01:26 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575538
 
>> I find Brit Hume's remarks to be misinformed, unfairly critical of Buddhism and inappropriate in a secular format.

How did you feel about Michael Newdow's remarks?