Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (541465)	1/7/2010 12:57:08 AM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1574411

"What, do you want a treatise on the subject?" Not really. Just anything he can twist, distort or pretend that you are wrong. Tenchu is deep into playing 'gotcha'.

To: SilentZ who wrote (541465)	1/7/2010 11:52:01 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574411

Z, I can tell you why I think my version of right and wrong is valid. Because it actually works when tried. There is a strong record of it over thousands of years. You can point to the failures of organized religion (Crusades, Inquisition) and reject the underlying message. That's fine. I can point to the failures of organized atheism (Hitler, Stalin, and Mao) and reject any message of godlessness. Same thing. The whole point is that everyone has their own definition of right and wrong. Doesn't mean every definition is valid. You need to be able to defend yours, especially the distinctions between it and those you reject, if you want yours to actually be accepted. Either that, or you can do what CJ does. Dodge, spin, and project. That might make you feel better, but you sure won't get any respect from me, for what it's worth. Tenchusatsu