Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ATPX: Lunn Industries and Technical Products Group merge. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Emec who wrote (306)	11/3/1997 11:33:00 AM
From: ivan solotaroff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1923

David: Why don't you just call your broker, and CUT IT OUT! You're stinking rich as of today, man. GOOODDDD! I'd hate to see you on a day when your stock goes DOWN by 25%. Yours in ATPX (the company formerly known as LUNN, with whom, for the present moment, a 1:1 share arrangement has been struck), Ivan

To: Emec who wrote (306)	11/3/1997 12:15:00 PM
From: count gold	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1923

MF=Motley Fool-DF=Detroit Fool....Excuse me; is bouncing off the walls; threatening suits, calling Special Agents of the FBI for imagined slights, losing all cool, reporting people to SI webmistress ,flying off in 15 directions, confusing the situation and executing long leaps without looking first a trademark of tax attorneys with law degrees??? Dean Witter/Morgan Stanley advise that Lunn is now exchanged 1 for 1 with ATPX; we ARE up as many have stated and stock will be re-valued and shares realigned (1 for 10) by tomorrow. Beware of DFs tendency to run off in many directions a tendency sometimes described as "loose-cannon" behaviour.. I am categorically NOT saying he is a loose cannon!! I am saying it may be good idea to keep the analogy in mind when dealing with someone like him. DF...are you saying that i and others have lost 90% of our investment in LUNN shares we bought prior to today or are you just taking us all along on your "mission misconception"??? Your posts leave a mixed trail of emphatic statements and confusion. Is this a repeat of the hissy fit you threw on TPRO thread???