Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (542205)	1/8/2010 6:21:26 PM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575784

Listen, in my mind there is no doubt, that the defense will call for US being at least part if not fully responsible for the event, having let the man board a US aircraft in spite off all that intelligence on his status provided by his father and the services. And, in a civil court - and sorry to say this - I would agree with the defense here. Read my lips, this issue definitely will come up IMO. That said, his father's main motivation for reporting him really was keeping his somewhat 'confused' son out of trouble, right? And the incompetence of Obama and his next in command Juliet Incompetano prevented any acting on his warnings and thus can be claimed co responsible for letting his beloved son get on board, act out his follies and thus end up in the slammer for 20 years or so. /Taro