Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (542231)	1/8/2010 7:00:24 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574761

Z, > You're presenting arguments without much to back them up. I provide as much support for my opinions as you do with yours. Not true. You present quite a few observations with no backing at all. Some would call them opinions.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (542231)	1/8/2010 7:52:42 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574761

>Anyway, I'll tell you why I think the "Cadillac tax" is a sham in addition to the reasons you state: >There aren't really that many "Cadillac plans" to tax, so just taxing them won't amount to much. You don't think there are many plans that are at least $8,500 for an individual? >Democrats are under tremendous pressure to make this bill look "revenue neutral." Which they shouldn't be. >Hence they have to pass hidden taxes up the wazoo. Didn't you just state that this tax isn't much of a tax? -Z