Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40344)	1/12/2010 6:31:43 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

and then use Hellfire missiles that cause far less damage than older bombs or missiles That's the way things are going. Rather than Filling Tritonal, Minol or H6 Filling weight 192 lb (89 kg) en.wikipedia.org or 125 pounds (57 kg) hollow charge with contact fuze in A, B, D and H models; 300 pounds (140 kg) high explosive penetrator with delayed fuze in E, F, G, J and K models en.wikipedia.org or something bigger, you get Warhead AFX-757 Dense Inert Metal Explosive Warhead weight 38 lb (17 kg)[2] en.wikipedia.org High Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT); 20 lb (9 kg) tandem anti-armor Metal augmented charge (MAC); 18 lb (8 kg) shaped-charge Blast Fragmentation en.wikipedia.org or 10 to 20 lbs of exploses from something like this en.wikipedia.org a developing version of the AIM-9 Sidwider that can hit ground targets (again about 20lbs of explosives) freerepublic.com flightglobal.com or even Warhead: 1.05 kg (2.3 lb) (HEAT). en.wikipedia.org