Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (542994)	1/12/2010 12:30:11 PM
From: combjelly	2 Recommendations Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1573930

"His ticket was always round trip." How much do you want to bet that they will bring up the 'one way ticket' some months from now?

To: tejek who wrote (542994)	1/12/2010 12:41:26 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573930

>> His ticket was always round trip. Conceptually, this may be hard for you to understand. And I know, without any doubt, it is beyond CJ's ability to comprehend. BUT IT IS TOTALLY BESIDE THE POINT WHETHER THE GUY HAD A ROUND TRIP TICKET. Just doesn't matter. Because the underlying point is not based on a "round trip ticket" or not. The underlying point is that there are 100 or 500 other criteria that ought to be getting examined, while the articles of clothing a person is wearing should be de-emphasized. This is just like the WMD argument; you are so simple minded that you can't deal with an abstract example. If you say WMD that must be it. If you say one-way ticket, that must be it. Don't even try. Leave it for the people who can reason.