SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wayners who wrote (24489)1/13/2010 10:42:45 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Yes, so?



To: Wayners who wrote (24489)1/13/2010 10:45:13 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Barons of Wall Street testify to crisis panel

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The chiefs of Wall Street's biggest firms defended the lucrative pay practices and huge size of their businesses, but conceded regulatory changes are needed at the first hearing of a congressional commission investigating the 2008 global financial crisis.

reuters.com

With U.S. unemployment near a 26-year-high after the worst recession in decades, public fury is growing over the crisis, taxpayer bailouts and huge bonuses for bankers.

Raising their right hands Wednesday to be sworn in before reading prepared statements, Goldman Sachs Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and other executives braced for sharp questions from the panel.

Phil Angelides, chairman of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, told the CEOs his panel will hold hearings through the year and take testimony from hundreds of individuals.

"People are angry. They have a right to be," Angelides said, citing Wall Street's bonuses and profits.

Blankfein said his firm reaped rewards from government support during the financial meltdown.

"We believe that the government action was critical and we benefited from it," he said. "The system clearly needs to be structured so that private capital, rather than government capital, is used to stabilize troubled firms promptly before a crisis metastasizes."

Dimon told the commission that there may be legitimate concerns that bonuses contributed to excessive risk taking, but he defended JPMorgan's pay practices, saying "they have been and remain appropriate."

The commission's hearing could fuel popular resentment of the banks and at the government's role in rescuing a powerful industry seen by many Americans as greedy and irresponsible.

The basic causes of the crisis are well known. From a real estate bubble and subprime mortgages, to runaway securitization and exotic debt instruments, the financial system failed spectacularly in the final months of the Bush administration.

The 10-member commission may be hard-pressed to unearth new revelations on that score, but its work is still expected to have an impact, according to analysts.

"We're in a very volatile period now, with all the bonuses and with the hearing starting tomorrow," said Greg Valliere, policy analyst at investment advisory firm Soleil Securities.

"The hearings could be explosive and further intensify public indignation... You just have to wonder if the politicians can contain the anger," he said.

The panel, due to report by December 15, is modeled after the Pecora Commission, which investigated the Wall Street crash of 1929. Its findings helped lead to the formation of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other key reforms.

Whether the Angelides Commission has a similar impact is yet to be determined.

The hearings will unfold with the U.S. Senate Banking Committee engaged in sensitive closed-door negotiations on a sweeping overhaul of financial regulation, the aim being to prevent another banking crisis in the future.

The Obama administration and some senators are concerned about the timing and potential impact of the commission's hearings, said Joseph Engelhard, a policy analyst at investment advisory firm Capital Alpha Partners.

Worries center on "any revelation which creates a populist outburst that could possibly derail compromises that are being made on the Hill," he said.

But at least one member of the banking committee, Senator Bob Corker, told Reuters that he looks forward to the commission hearings and what they will reveal.

"The commission meetings, from my viewpoint, are nothing but helpful... I'm actually meeting with some of the witnesses while they're in town. It's all good as far as I'm concerned," said Corker, a Republican, in an interview.

(Reporting by Kevin Drawbaugh; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)



To: Wayners who wrote (24489)1/13/2010 11:01:08 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 103300
 
Bank CEOs see need for regulation

By Jennifer Liberto, senior writer
January 13, 2010: 9:20 AM ET
money.cnn.com

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Four top bank chief executives began testifying in Washington on Wednesday about their role in the financial crisis, telling a panel appointed by Congress that regulatory reform is needed to help prevent future crises.

"I believe it is useful, in light of the lessons we take away from this crisis, to consider important principles for our industry, for policymakers and for regulators as we move towards reform," Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs' CEO, said in prepared testimony before the commission.

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, a 10-member panel appointed last summer by Congress, is holding its first public hearing. First up were the heads of some of the best-known and largest banks: Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500), Morgan Stanley (MS, Fortune 500), J.P. Morgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) and Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500).

The panel's chairman, Philip Angelides, has said that he's interested in hearing about the banks' role in creating the crisis, as well as finding out how they became "too big to fail."

The federal government stepped in to prop up the banks in fall 2008, creating the Troubled Asset Relief Program to help provide them with liquidity.

"We're after the truth, the hard facts, because it's our job to provide an unbiased accounting of financial crisis," Angelides said at the start of the hearing. "This forum may be our last best chance to stake stock of what really happened."

The commissioners told CNN on Monday they don't expect any big revelations or "gotcha" moments with the bank chief executives, and view the hearing as a fact-finding mission.

The chief executives -- Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, John Mack of Morgan Stanley and Brian Moynihan of Bank of America -- will be testifying under oath.

In written testimony, the bank chiefs said they didn't expect the financial crisis and especially its magnitude.

"After the fact, it is easy to be convinced that the signs were visible and compelling," Blankfein said in his written statement. "In hindsight, events not only look predictable, but look like they were obvious or known. But none of us know what is going to happen."

So far, the commission has already talked to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke, but that testimony isn't being made public yet.

Lawmakers say the commission was modeled after the Pecora Commission, a panel that was convened after the 1929 Wall Street crash and other events leading to the Great Depression.

The Pecora panel's findings led to an overhaul of federal banking laws, including the creation of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. Glass-Steagall divided investment banking from government-insured commercial banking; ending that separation in the 1990s was seen by some critics as contributing to the current crisis.

Slow start

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission has taken a while to get up on its feet.

The panel was appointed last July and held its first meeting in September. It has only started getting staffed up over the past few months.

It has new offices in downtown Washington, a few blocks northwest of the White House. Funded to the tune of $8 million, it aims to employ between 40 and 50 investigators and other staffers.

The crisis panel's one big goal is to complete a final report, sort of like the final 9/11 Commission report that found federal agencies missed signs of the impending terrorist attacks in 2001. The financial crisis report is due Dec. 15.

Critics have noted the panel's impact may be blunted by timing, as the House has already passed a bill to overhaul regulations and the Senate is deep in negotiations on similar proposals.

But panel members have consistently pledged their work will serve as more than window dressing for politicians worried about the appearance that they allowed the financial crisis to happen.

The panel, which has subpoena power, plans to issue interim reports as it collects data, Angelides has said.

The panel's second-in-command is Bill Thomas, a retired California Republican congressman described as strong-willed during his tenure running the powerful Ways and Means Committee.

Other key panel members include: Keith Hennessey, an economic adviser under President George W. Bush; former Sen. Bob Graham, a Florida Democrat; and Brooksley Born, a past chairwoman of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, who called for stronger regulation of complex financial products such as derivatives in the 1990s.

The panel didn't invite Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) CEO Vikram Pandit this go round, said panel spokesman Tucker Warren. "That doesn't mean we won't be talking with Citigroup, either publicly or privately, in the course of our investigation," he added.

The chief executives are no strangers to Washington hearings. Blankfein, Dimon and Mack were seated together last February when a House Financial Services pelted them with questions about the TARP program.

This time around, Angelides said he expects the tone to be "professional" but also "tough, thorough and fair."

"There's a real hunger among the people of this country to know what happened," Angelides said. "We're not out to get anyone. We're out to get to the bottom of what happened as best we can." To top of page