Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (40443)	1/13/2010 1:29:43 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 71588

Re: "Regulatory reform probably is needed," Ya THINK?????????????? <GGG> Re: "but that doesn't imply a higher overall level of regulation is needed." As per ALWAYS... what is need is the PROPER, the CORRECT, the most effective (for the American people) reforms and regulations. And nothing else. (Now... as far as "higher level" of regulation goes... while I think I understand and completely agree with you that unduly burdensome and/or ineffective 'regulation' is NOT desirable... I'm also not really sure how one would go about measuring what you were just talking about [in the words you used 'overall higher level of regulation']. Would you measure the regulations by the pound? How many pounds of paper it took to write them?) I think I'll just stick with the comments I've made above: What is need is the PROPER, the CORRECT, the most effective (for the American people) reforms and regulations.