Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (543698)	1/14/2010 9:53:29 AM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1574685

As bentway pointed out, there were multiple post-911 attacks during the Bush administration (show bomber, Anthrax attacks, shooting at the LA airport, DC sniper, etc.). You just like to ignore facts when you make your assertions. I don't ignore anything; the important point of reference, at least for me, is the post-9/11 period. You can rationally "blame" GWB for 9/11 and he has to be judged based on what happened afterward. There was not anything GWB might have done differently that would have avoided 9/11. OTOH, there were, according to Michael Scheur, 14 different occasions when Clinton and/or the current nitwit in charge (Drennon) refused to take bin Laden out. So you like an emboldened Iran that has no immediate enemies, is that right? Thx to Bush, Iran now can concentrate on getting a nuclear bomb unimpeded by warfare with Iraq. Talk about someone ignoring the facts! You have no basis for either of these statements. GWB worked from 2001 toward eliminating Iran's capability but made the mistake of doing it through the UN instead of bombing the shit out of them. GWB is, however, responsible via the Iraq War for the freedom movement within Iraq.