SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Trumptown who wrote (399561)1/14/2010 1:54:49 PM
From: MythMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Message 26245131



To: Trumptown who wrote (399561)1/14/2010 2:00:20 PM
From: Real Man  Respond to of 436258
 
Probably meaningless -g-



To: Trumptown who wrote (399561)1/14/2010 7:36:06 PM
From: Real Man  Respond to of 436258
 
Yes, the fact that they are doing more strict requirement
for energy and commodities is your typical PPT crap. They
did it to gold (raise margin requirements) many, many times in
the past to crash it.

Forex is actually new. I was under impression that London runs
it, thou. They are not doing it to Spoos -g-



To: Trumptown who wrote (399561)1/15/2010 8:00:31 AM
From: Real Man  Respond to of 436258
 
The same old. I actually wonder what effect this will have
on the gold market. Last time they tried to control it through
IMF sales this Fall it blew in their face. Ditto this, the
market could go physical and blow in their faces, especially
since they are after other commodities. Why don't they turn
their attention to 500 Trillion notional OTC interest rates
contracts? Nope. Never. -g-

moneycontrol.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News