SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (543989)1/14/2010 11:15:59 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575354
 
>> OBAMA MORE EFFECTIVE ON SPENDING CUTS....

How can you possibly say that?

Obama - $800 Billion "stimulus" that didn't do shit, TOTALLY WASTED

Obama - $100s of Billions in bailouts and taking over private companies as political payola for the unions.

Obama - TRILLIONS of increased government expenditures for health care should it pass

Obama - TRILLIONS of dollars for a bogus, useless cap-and-trade program if he has his way

Your remark was just stupid.



To: tejek who wrote (543989)1/15/2010 4:02:50 AM
From: Joe NYC2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575354
 
$6.9 billion cut after $787 billion increase. Surely you are joking....



To: tejek who wrote (543989)1/15/2010 8:28:47 PM
From: RetiredNow1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575354
 
For all the complaining from the Tea Party crowd, there's an odd disconnect. These folks applauded a Republican president who increased the deficit and increased the size of government, but they literally take to the streets to denounce a Democratic president who has cut taxes, cut spending, and makes sure his proposals are paid for. Why throw a fit over the more fiscally responsible president?

It's a good question.