SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (82167)1/16/2010 3:21:22 AM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
<<<That's not the point and does nothing to bolster your universal claim that: "There is not one iota of evidence.>>>

"You seem to believe that Flew's beliefs (whether real or apparent) are somehow to inform the e3vidence for or against a God."

You seem to think that substituting insults in place of rational arguments makes you look like a big man. They don't! I simply cited the same "evidence" that He: (a noted and thoroughly qualified philosopher) pointed to as instrumental in his decision to move away from Atheism. That should be simple enough for even a school yard bully such as yourself to understand. Capito?

"Nothing in Cosmology is evidential to the idea of a god."

Big Bang Cosmology strongly suggests that the universe has a cause that is outside of itself. (Only Atheists believe that something comes from nothing). There is even less evidence for the eternal universe or multi-verse theories. Now logic would also dictate that the most likely cause of personal beings in the universe would also be personal, but that's probably too much for your infantile thinking to fathom right now.

Ordered informational complexity is likewise certainly the result of a personal, intelligent, agent. The difference between a cloud that looks like a fluffy bunny and sky writing that says "Vote No On Prop 1234" is likewise probably just too much to digest, but there it is. It's so much easier to think of another childish insult instead.

That's two "iotas of evidence" both of which prove you wrong.