Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (106696)	1/17/2010 10:17:29 PM
From: Casaubon	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

science.howstuffworks.com demolishing a building, in particular one with steel supports, requires a highly trained, significant presence for a long period of prep time. You can't just stuff your pockets with some explosives and pretend you are repair personnel. It requires more extensive effort than that. Having the building simply function while this prep work is undertaken is not feasible. Nor is it feasible no one would speak of it. As I already stated there was a lot of chaotic reporting that day. I recall numerous reports of the Towers themselves collapsing before they actually did collapse. This was just non eye witness reporting. As I stated Silverstein claims he was talking about pulling the firefighters, as it was too dangerous to have them remain. Your link supports this, IMO. Seconday explosions aren't proof of building tampering. They occur in fires! Yes, Bush Lied about his motives to attack Iraq.