Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (68354)	1/18/2010 6:04:48 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh	Respond to of 149317

ah, the angry white male. I recall him from the 70's. and a lot from the 90's. wft? what is he angry about? I actually am curious. granted, I might fall over laughing, but I will listen in enerst and not laugh unless it is toooooo silly. and if that's it, dadt has nothing to do with it, though that is brought up as 'left' dissatisfaction. I know I've had my moments on that, but been brought to patience. and come on it, it's been a year. only a year. and before dadt it was worse... I honestly did want to join up at 18. I had two male friends joining who talked to me a lot about it and I really wanted to join, but we discussed that element... in 1976 I would have had to have lied. at the time, I could have lived with dadt, cause not like I dated or had any notions of dating, so who what's to tell??? oh, there is the rebutting come ons, but that's another thing, and any woman who rebuts come ons learns to deal with being called a lesbian, cause otherwise why would you turn down such a great offer??? anyways... point is... I realize we made progress with dadt, and now we are moving to go the full distance, so even if I can not serve now, young men and women who are queer can. angry white males? I am sooooooooooo tired of them. they can move to Haiti, and we'll move the Haitians here. howsa bout that? they can have their own lil country.

To: tejek who wrote (68354)	1/18/2010 6:08:04 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 149317

oh, and anger is a health issue, so - all angry white men should have their health insurance canceled pronto. I see no reason the rest of us should be paying to substidize their anger.

To: tejek who wrote (68354)	1/18/2010 6:16:25 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 149317

and another - it is white men on right and left. white men on the left have nothing to lose if Brown is elected, so it is fine for them to be flippant. they are simply doing the 'two lil hitler' thing with the white guy on the right. enough already. some of us have lives that are actually affected by these elections. and the leftie white guys go on about... well, we care about Afghanistan and our troops. pffft. noise. you aren't fighting and you aren't paying any more taxes over it and electing Brown sure won't stop it. it is the lil hitlers, the white men on the right and left fighting it out, and they don't give a fak. any left straight white male with insurance who says 'elect brown' must have nothing to lose. a lot of other people have a lot to lose if he is elected. and can one of those men, even the ones on the right, say what they would gain?