SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (77614)1/18/2010 7:15:23 PM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224769
 
brown will win by 15% but the results will show 2%. dems are such cheaters



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (77614)1/18/2010 7:16:20 PM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224769
 
Ed Schultz Would “Cheat” to Win an Election
Jonathan H. Adler • January 17, 2010 4:04 pm

When Rush Limbuagh suggested that his listeners vote in the 2008 Democratic presidential primaries — so-called “Operation Chaos” – MSNBC’s Dan Abrams called it “un-American,” and others suggested it might be “criminal.” I wonder what Abrams thinks about MSNBC’s own Ed Schultz, who last week declared he would commit voter fraud to prevent Scott Brown from winning the special election to fill Ted Kennedy’s old Senate seat in Massachusetts. Discussing the election on his radio show this past week Schultz said :

I tell you what. If I lived in Massachusetts I’d try to vote ten times . I don’t know if they’d let me or not but I’d try to. Yeah, that’s right. I’d cheat to keep these bastards out. I would. Because that’s exactly what they are.

It’s pretty shocking to hear a prominent media personality embracing voter fraud like that, but there you have it.

volokh.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (77614)1/18/2010 7:58:32 PM
From: Ann Corrigan2 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224769
 
Exaggerated Brown +9 estimate on Drudge has to be Dems disinformation to get their usually passive voters to the polls.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (77614)1/18/2010 10:06:03 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224769
 
intrade.com how many recount ???



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (77614)1/19/2010 4:36:06 AM
From: tonto3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224769
 
Brown's victory today will be an important step in improving our government.

People are very excited. One party rule shows us once again that it is bad for our country.