SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neeka who wrote (344053)1/19/2010 4:09:42 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793957
 
She should win by 20 points, if she doesn't it's a win for the repubs



To: Neeka who wrote (344053)1/19/2010 4:15:29 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793957
 
What would be worse is if Brown wins, but Voinovich or some other jackass Republican switches and votes to pass Obamacare. That will suck the air right out of the republican balloon.



To: Neeka who wrote (344053)1/19/2010 4:46:42 PM
From: Bill1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793957
 
Win or lose, the party’s over for Obama & Co.

By Howie Carr | Tuesday, January 19, 2010

The snow is brown - Scott Brown. Guys in pickup trucks don’t let a few flurries bother them.

Whether Scott Brown wins or loses today, the lesson is clear. The people are mad as hell, and they aren’t going to take it anymore.

This isn’t an election, it’s a movement.

Over the past week or so, we’ve been listening as people from out-of-state were saying something most of us have never heard before:

“Oh God, I wish I lived in Massachusetts.”

If only for a day they wished it, so that they could vote for Scott Brown, to let the moonbats and the Beautiful People and the illegal aliens know that they don’t own this country - not yet anyway.

Health care “reform” dead for a generation? Let’s keep our fingers crossed. Two would be even better.

Here’s the thing about Martha Coakley: she was trying to sell a product that nobody wanted. She didn’t even bother to update the talking points once people figured out what a crock she was dishing, about how the rationing scheme was “revenue neutral” for the first decade blah-blah-blah.

There’s an old saying attributed to H.L. Mencken: “Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.”

Martha Coakley just disproved that theory.

There’s another old saying: “You can’t fool all of the people all of the time.”

Marsha - pardon me, Martha, thought she could. But then, I’ll bet she isn’t even aware of that quote. After all, it was said by Abraham Lincoln, or as Marsha would put it, “Republican Abraham Lincoln.”

It turns out Martha Coakley wasn’t Shannon O’Brien. She was worse than Shannon O’Brien. She was the female Tom Dewey, an empty pantsuit. Keep on truckin’, Martha.

I got a fax yesterday from a commercial airline pilot from New Hampshire. He said he was talking to his neighbor, a moonbat lawyer afflicted with an apparently incurable case of Bush Derangement Syndrome, who after a year of endless outrages in D.C., had suddenly gone into remission.

“Even he admitted,” the pilot said, “the radical leftist party is over for Obama and the overreaching Democrat nutcases in Congress. This groundswell had nothing to do with a poorly run senatorial campaign and everything to do with an absolutely outraged national electorate.”

Hey, Martha, good move running those spots quoting Brown as saying he’d be the 41st vote against the Obama rationing scheme.

How about that Boston Globe - whatever happened to that 15 percent Coakley lead in the Globe’s phony-baloney poll, to undercut the Brown surge. Another proud moment for the Kool-Aid swilling bow-tied bumkissers of Morrissey Boulevard, which will certainly be mentioned when the obituary for the moonbats’ Bible is written a few months from now.

Article URL: bostonherald.com