SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (68464)1/19/2010 10:22:51 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Coakly lost bcause Mass has health care and they did not want Obama's health care on top of that in case it might cost them money. No one understands the health care bill; and because Obama has not been doing what he promised.

As well, the helath care deal making was nausating e.g. Nelson, Lieberman, Landeroux!

And Obama has been real cozy with Wall street, Health care and the military and the people don't like it. He has been cozy with Bush, who shod be in jail for gods sake.!



To: tejek who wrote (68464)1/19/2010 11:15:08 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 149317
 
Liberals are the majority in the democratic party. Every liberal I know is a dem. Every single one. We control the party, so we need to do it wisely. But Reid has been letting the blue dogs control the senate. Reid is pro life and anti gay marriage I think.

Pelosi is a hard core liberal and controls the house the way Reid needs to control the senate, IMO.

But Obama dissing Howard dean is what really makes me doubt his wisdom all the time. Howard Dean is brillant and measured. He would have been 10 times better than Rahm or Sebilius.

>>The liberal dems are in the majority.

I don't know what you're smoking but that just ain't true. And Coakley did not lose in MA because Obama was not liberal enough. Liberals are a minority in this country....period.iberalsare a majority in the democratic party