To: Andrew N. Cothran who wrote (344424 ) 1/20/2010 11:46:09 AM From: gamesmistress Respond to of 793884 Ramussen's exit polling says Brown won by winning 3/4 of the independent voters, plus almost a quarter of registered Dems. The reasons for their support were somewhat mixed, though. I'd love the read the complete story of Brown's campaign sometime. It shows a lot of political savvy to have sensed which way the political winds were blowing and get the support from the experts he needed to pull this off. It also helped that Coakley appears to be politically tone-deaf. Brown Wins Stunning Victory in Massachusetts Tuesday, January 19, 2010rasmussenreports.com For the first time since 1972, Massachusetts voters are sending a Republican to Washington as a U.S. senator. In a stunning upset, Republican Scott Brown has narrowly defeated Democrat Martha Coakley.It’s hard to believe that just two weeks ago, Rasmussen Reports released the first poll showing that Brown had pulled to within single digits of his Democratic opponent. At that time, Brown was down by nine points. Prior to that release, “The overwhelming conventional wisdom in both parties … was that Martha Coakley was a lock,” writes The Politico’s Ben Smith, adding, “It's hard to recall a single poll changing the mood of a race quite that dramatically.” A week later, the shock continued as our final poll in the race showed that Brown had pulled to within two points of Coakley. At that time, among those who were certain they would vote, Brown was up by two.In the end, Brown pulled off the upset in large part because he won unaffiliated voters by a 73% to 25% margin. The senator-elect also picked up 23% of the vote from Democrats. [Our polling shows that 53% of voters in Massachusetts are Democrats, 21% Republican and 26% not affiliated with either party.] Coakley also barely carried a usually reliable Democratic constituency. Union workers went for her by just six points, 52% to 46%. (Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook. Fifty-six percent (56%) of voters in the state say health care was the most important factor in their voting decision. Brown made it clear in the closing days of the campaign that he intended to go to Washington to vote against the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. Twenty-five percent (25%) of Massachusetts voters say the economy was most important. Forty-seven percent (47%) favor the health care legislation before Congress while 51% oppose it. However, the intensity was clearly with those who are opposed. Just 25% of voters in Massachusetts Strongly Favor the plan while 41% Strongly Oppose it. Fifty percent (50%) say it would be better to pass no health care legislation at all rather than passing the bill before Congress. Looking back, 30% say the bank bailouts were a good idea. Thirty-four percent (34%) say the same about the auto industry bailouts. Today’s voters in Massachusetts are evenly divided in their opinion of the Tea Party Movement. Fifty-seven percent (57%) of voters in the state offer a favorable opinion of Brown while 47% say the same about Coakley. Twenty-eight percent (28%) say Brown is Very Conservative politically; 44% say he’s Somewhat Conservative, and 22% view him as a political moderate. Thirty-five percent (35%) say Coakley is Very Liberal; 36% say she’s Somewhat Liberal, and 21% view her as a moderate. Fifty-three percent (53%) approve of the way that Barack Obama has handled his job as President. Thirty-nine percent (39%) approve of the way Deval Patrick has handled his job as governor of Massachusetts.